Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
Published on: January 5, 2024
Effectiveness of Intra-anal Biofeedback and Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Children With Refractory
Seham Mohammed Abd El-Moghny1, Manal Salah El-Din2, Samah Attia El Shemy2
1Department of Physical Therapy, Banha Teaching Hospital, Qalyubia, Egypt.
Insights
Electrical stimulation (ES) and biofeedback (BF) improved pelvic floor muscle activity and reduced bedwetting in children with refractory primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (PMNE). ES showed superior results compared to BF.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation
- Neuromodulation
Background:
- Refractory primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (PMNE) poses a significant challenge in pediatric urology.
- Current treatments often involve behavioral therapy and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training, but effectiveness can be limited in refractory cases.
- Investigating novel therapeutic modalities is crucial for improving outcomes in children with PMNE.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of intra-anal biofeedback (BF) and intra-anal electrical stimulation (ES) in treating refractory primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (PMNE).
- To assess the impact of BF and ES on pelvic floor muscle (PFM) activity, nocturnal bladder capacity, and the frequency of wet night episodes.
- To evaluate these interventions in conjunction with standard behavioral therapy and PFM training.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 90 children (aged 8-12 years) with refractory PMNE.
- Participants were assigned to three groups: control (behavioral therapy + PFM training), BF group (behavioral therapy + PFM training + intra-anal BF), and ES group (behavioral therapy + PFM training + intra-anal ES).
- Outcomes including PFM activity (electromyography), nocturnal bladder capacity (first morning voided volume), and enuresis frequency (diary) were measured before and after 3 months of treatment.
Main Results:
- All treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in PFM activity, bladder capacity, and reduced enuresis frequency compared to baseline.
- The intra-anal electrical stimulation (ES) group exhibited significantly greater improvements across all measured parameters compared to both the control (CON) and biofeedback (BF) groups.
- Both BF and ES, when added to standard therapy, proved effective, but ES demonstrated superior outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Intra-anal biofeedback (BF) and electrical stimulation (ES) are effective adjuncts to behavioral therapy and PFM training for treating refractory primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (PMNE).
- Intra-anal electrical stimulation (ES) was found to be more effective than intra-anal biofeedback (BF) in improving PFM activity, nocturnal bladder capacity, and reducing wet nights.
- These findings suggest ES as a promising therapeutic option for children with refractory PMNE.
Purpose:
To compare the effects of intra-anal biofeedback (BF) and intra-anal electrical stimulation (ES) on pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) activity, nocturnal bladder capacity, and frequency of wet night episodes in children with refractory primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (PMNE).
Methods:
Ninety children of both sexes aged 8-12 years with refractory PMNE participated in this study. They were randomly assigned to 3 groups of equal number: control group (CON) that underwent behavioral therapy and PFM training, and 2 study groups (BF and ES) that underwent the same program in addition to intra-anal BF training and intra-anal ES, respectively. PFMs activity was assessed using electromyography, nocturnal bladder capacity was evaluated by measuring the first morning voided volume, and a nocturnal enuresis diary was used for documenting wet night episodes before treatment and after 3 months of treatment.
Results:
After training, all groups showed statistically significant improvements in all measured outcomes compared to their pretreatment findings. The ES group showed significantly greater improvements in all measured outcomes than the CON and BF groups.
Conclusion:
Both intra-anal BF training and ES combined with behavioral therapy and PFMs training were effective in the treatment of PMNE, with intra-anal ES being superior to BF training.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Psychosexual Stages of Personality: Anal
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Random Error
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...

