Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

3.3K
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
3.3K
Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

11.6K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
11.6K
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods01:08

Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods

608
Renal clearance is a critical parameter encompassing kidney filtration, secretion, and reabsorption processes. It is calculated using a specific equation to determine the rate at which the kidneys clear a drug.
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
608
Protein Dynamics in Living Cells01:19

Protein Dynamics in Living Cells

2.7K
Different fluorescence-based techniques are used to study the protein dynamics in living cells. These techniques include FRAP, FRET, and PET.
Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a fluorescent-protein-based detection technique used to quantify protein movement rates within the cell. This method exposes a small portion of the cell to an intense laser beam. The laser beam causes permanent photobleaching of the fluorophore-tagged proteins in the exposed region. As the bleached...
2.7K
Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

3.4K
A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
3.4K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.2K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Consistent projection of Langevin dynamics: Preserving thermodynamics and kinetics in coarse-grained models.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Accurate and robust analysis of molecular kinetics with random features.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Data-Driven Characterization and Acceleration of Metastable Dynamics Using Koopman Operators.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Kinetically Consistent Coarse Graining Using Kernel-Based Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

AMUSET-TICA: A Tensor-Based Approach for Identifying Slow Collective Variables in Biomolecular Dynamics.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Thermodynamic Interpolation: A Generative Approach to Molecular Thermodynamics and Kinetics.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

14.9K

Quantitative comparison of adaptive sampling methods for protein dynamics.

Eugen Hruska1, Jayvee R Abella2, Feliks Nüske1

  • 1Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|January 3, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adaptive sampling methods accelerate simulations of rare events like protein folding. Strategies based on metastable regions are best for sampling slow dynamics without prior knowledge, while microstate identification excels at exploring new conformational spaces.

More Related Videos

Quantitative Autoradiographic Method for Determination of Regional Rates of Cerebral Protein Synthesis In Vivo
11:01

Quantitative Autoradiographic Method for Determination of Regional Rates of Cerebral Protein Synthesis In Vivo

Published on: June 28, 2019

7.4K
Comparison of Methods for Isolating Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples
07:16

Comparison of Methods for Isolating Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples

Published on: January 6, 2022

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

14.9K
Quantitative Autoradiographic Method for Determination of Regional Rates of Cerebral Protein Synthesis In Vivo
11:01

Quantitative Autoradiographic Method for Determination of Regional Rates of Cerebral Protein Synthesis In Vivo

Published on: June 28, 2019

7.4K
Comparison of Methods for Isolating Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples
07:16

Comparison of Methods for Isolating Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples

Published on: January 6, 2022

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Biophysics
  • Molecular dynamics simulations

Background:

  • Adaptive sampling methods accelerate rare event simulations in molecular dynamics (MD).
  • Markov state models are often combined with adaptive sampling.
  • Optimal strategies for diverse physical systems remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Systematically evaluate adaptive sampling strategies for protein folding simulations.
  • Compare strategy performance with and without prior system knowledge.
  • Determine theoretical limits for sampling speed-up.

Main Methods:

  • Emulated adaptive sampling strategies using models from existing MD trajectories.
  • Evaluated strategies on fast-folding proteins.
  • Assessed performance based on simulation goals (e.g., sampling slow dynamics vs. exploring conformational space).

Main Results:

  • No single adaptive sampling strategy is optimal for all goals.
  • Metastable region identification is most efficient for sampling slow dynamics without prior knowledge.
  • Microstate identification is superior for exploring new conformational regions.
  • Maximum speed-up increases with protein folding time.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of adaptive sampling strategy depends on the specific simulation objective.
  • Metastable region-based strategies are effective for unbiased sampling of slow processes.
  • Microstate-based strategies enhance exploration of conformational landscapes.
  • Adaptive sampling shows promise for characterizing slower biological processes beyond fast-folding proteins.