Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Clinical Practice Protocol of Creative Music Therapy for Preterm Infants and Their Parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Published on: January 7, 2020
Tailoring Antiplatelet Therapy Intensity to Ischemic and Bleeding Risk
Usman Baber1, Daniel E Leisman1, David J Cohen2
1Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (U.B., D.E.L., G.D., A.K., S.S., R.M.).
Balancing ischemic and bleeding risk is crucial for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Tailoring antiplatelet therapy (ticagrelor/prasugrel vs. clopidogrel) to individual patient risk profiles can optimize outcomes and potentially reduce costs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Balancing ischemic and bleeding risk is a critical, evolving challenge in managing patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Current antiplatelet therapy strategies require careful consideration of individual patient risk profiles to optimize clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To simulate the impact of ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel on adverse ischemic and bleeding events and associated costs.
- To evaluate how tailoring antiplatelet therapy intensity based on patient-specific ischemic and bleeding risk levels affects health utility and economic outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the validated PARIS risk score to estimate 1-year ischemic (myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis) and bleeding (BARC 3/5) event rates in 1497 patients post-PCI with drug-eluting stents.
- Applied treatment effects from randomized trials to simulate event rates with ticagrelor/prasugrel vs. clopidogrel, incorporating National Inpatient Sample data for cost estimations.
- Calculated net costs and quality-of-life-weighted event rates under various drug pricing scenarios to compare risk-tailored therapy with standard clopidogrel treatment.
Main Results:
- One-year ischemic event rates were 12.6, 24.1, and 66.1 per 1000 person-years for low, intermediate, and high ischemic risk, respectively.
- Corresponding bleeding event rates were 11.0, 23.9, and 66.2 per 1000 person-years for low, intermediate, and high bleeding risk.
- Ticagrelor/prasugrel favored utility-weighted events when ischemic risk matched or exceeded bleeding risk; clopidogrel was favored when bleeding risk was higher. Costs were sensitive to drug pricing, with risk-tailored therapy becoming cost-saving as generic market share increased.
Conclusions:
- Tailoring antiplatelet therapy intensity to individual patient risk profiles after PCI may enhance health utility.
- This personalized approach has the potential to generate significant cost savings within the first year post-PCI.
- Risk stratification is essential for optimizing antiplatelet treatment strategies in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Bleeding in Fresh Concrete
Bleeding can cause several issues in the concrete structure. Sometimes, the rising water gets trapped beneath large aggregate...
Relative Risk
Sound Intensity
Sound Intensity Level
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Gene Therapy

