Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

66.1K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
66.1K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

265.4K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
265.4K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

65.1K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
65.1K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

88.1K
Scientific Laws
88.1K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.9K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.9K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

579
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
579

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acronyms by any other name.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2025
Same author

Limitations in Medical Research: Recognition, Influence, and Warning.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2024
Same author

Reference Hygiene and Death on the Internet - Decay, Rot, Half-Life, Deterioration, and Corruption.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2022
Same author

A Novel Individual Mentored Methodology to Peer Review for Residents/Fellows.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2021
Same author

Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2021
Same author

Abdominal Compliance and Laparoscopy: A Review.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.1K

Hedging, Weasel Words, and Truthiness in Scientific Writing.

Douglas E Ott1

  • 1School of Engineering Mercer University Macon, Georgia, USA.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
|January 5, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Scientific writing demands truth. Ambiguous language and "weasel words" can create false narratives, turning beliefs into perceived facts. Critical reading is essential to distinguish reality from authorial intent.

Keywords:
HedgingLanguageScientific writingTruthinessUncertainty

More Related Videos

Writing and Low-Temperature Characterization of Oxide Nanostructures
06:43

Writing and Low-Temperature Characterization of Oxide Nanostructures

Published on: July 18, 2014

10.4K
Writing Bragg Gratings in Multicore Fibers
08:48

Writing Bragg Gratings in Multicore Fibers

Published on: April 20, 2016

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.1K
Writing and Low-Temperature Characterization of Oxide Nanostructures
06:43

Writing and Low-Temperature Characterization of Oxide Nanostructures

Published on: July 18, 2014

10.4K
Writing Bragg Gratings in Multicore Fibers
08:48

Writing Bragg Gratings in Multicore Fibers

Published on: April 20, 2016

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Communication
  • Epistemology in Science

Background:

  • Scientific discourse requires factual accuracy.
  • Ambiguity and hedging language can distort truth.
  • Reader interpretation can lead to "truthiness"—belief presented as fact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the dangers of ambiguous language in scientific writing.
  • To differentiate between factual reporting and "truthiness."

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of linguistic strategies in scientific publications.
  • Examination of reader interpretation of scientific texts.

Main Results:

  • Hedging and imprecise language can foster "truthiness."
  • Reader subjectivity can override objective data.

Conclusions:

  • Scientists must be aware of linguistic pitfalls.
  • Promoting critical reading enhances scientific understanding and reality-based interpretation.