Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Validation of the corticomedullary difference in magnetic resonance imaging-derived apparent diffusion coefficient
Lena Berchtold1, Iris Friedli2, Lindsey A Crowe2
1Service and Laboratory of Nephrology, Department for Statistics, Department of Internal Medicine Specialties and of Physiology and Metabolism, University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Background:
Kidney cortical interstitial fibrosis (IF) is highly predictive of renal prognosis and is currently assessed by the evaluation of a biopsy. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising tool to evaluate kidney fibrosis via the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), but suffers from inter-individual variability. We recently applied a novel MRI protocol to allow calculation of the corticomedullary ADC difference (ΔADC). We here present the validation of ΔADC for fibrosis assessment in a cohort of 164 patients undergoing biopsy and compare it with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and other plasmatic parameters for the detection of fibrosis.
Methods:
This monocentric cross-sectional study included 164 patients undergoing renal biopsy at the Nephrology Department of the University Hospital of Geneva between October 2014 and May 2018. Patients underwent diffusion-weighted imaging, and T1 and T2 mappings, within 1 week after biopsy. MRI results were compared with gold standard histology for fibrosis assessment.
Results:
Absolute cortical ADC or cortical T1 values correlated poorly to IF assessed by the biopsy, whereas ΔADC was highly correlated to IF (r=-0.52, P < 0.001) and eGFR (r = 0.37, P < 0.01), in both native and allograft patients. ΔT1 displayed a lower, but significant, correlation to IF and eGFR, whereas T2 did not correlate to IF nor to eGFR. ΔADC, ΔT1 and eGFR were independently associated with kidney fibrosis, and their combination allowed detection of extensive fibrosis with good specificity.
Conclusion:
ΔADC is better correlated to IF than absolute cortical or medullary ADC values. ΔADC, ΔT1 and eGFR are independently associated to IF and allow the identification of patients with extensive IF.
Insights
A novel MRI technique, corticomedullary ADC difference (ΔADC), shows strong correlation with kidney fibrosis. This method, along with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), can identify patients with significant kidney fibrosis.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Kidney interstitial fibrosis (IF) is a key predictor of renal prognosis.
- Current assessment relies on invasive kidney biopsy.
- Diffusion MRI offers a non-invasive alternative but faces variability; a novel protocol calculating corticomedullary ADC difference (ΔADC) was developed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the novel ΔADC measurement for assessing kidney fibrosis.
- To compare ΔADC with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and other MRI parameters in fibrosis detection.
- To evaluate the combined diagnostic performance of ΔADC, ΔT1, and eGFR for identifying extensive kidney fibrosis.
Main Methods:
- A monocentric cross-sectional study included 164 patients undergoing renal biopsy.
- Diffusion-weighted imaging and T1/T2 mapping MRI were performed within one week post-biopsy.
- MRI results were correlated with histological assessment of fibrosis.
Main Results:
- ΔADC demonstrated a high correlation with kidney interstitial fibrosis (r=-0.52, P<0.001) and eGFR (r=0.37, P<0.01).
- Absolute cortical ADC and T1 values showed poor correlation with fibrosis.
- ΔADC, ΔT1, and eGFR were independently associated with kidney fibrosis, with their combination yielding good specificity for detecting extensive fibrosis.
Conclusions:
- ΔADC is a more reliable MRI marker for kidney fibrosis than absolute ADC values.
- ΔADC, ΔT1, and eGFR are independent predictors of kidney fibrosis.
- The combination of ΔADC, ΔT1, and eGFR effectively identifies patients with extensive kidney fibrosis.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area

