Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

1.8K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
1.8K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.7K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.7K
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

485
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
485
Elements and Compounds01:27

Elements and Compounds

104.6K
Pure substances consist of only one type of matter. A pure substance can be an element or a compound. An element consists of only one type of atom, while a compound consists of two or more types of atoms held together by a chemical bond.
Elements
Elements are classified as atomic or molecular based on the nature of their basic units. They are unique forms of matter with specific chemical and physical properties that cannot break down into smaller substances by ordinary chemical reactions. There...
104.6K
Periodic Classification of the Elements04:00

Periodic Classification of the Elements

59.0K
The periodic table arranges atoms based on increasing atomic number so that elements with the same chemical properties recur periodically. When their electron configurations are added to the table, a periodic recurrence of similar electron configurations in the outer shells of these elements is observed. Because they are in the outer shells of an atom, valence electrons play the most important role in chemical reactions. The outer electrons have the highest energy of the electrons in an atom...
59.0K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Comparison of Concussion Risk Functions Generated from Two Different Datasets.

Stapp car crash journal·2026
Same author

EFFECT OF FILTERING KINEMATICS ON FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS OF HEAD IMPACTS IN HIGH SCHOOL FEMALE LACROSSE.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
Same authorSame journal

Traumatic Brain Injury in Vulnerable Road Users: Analysis of German In-Depth Crash Data to Inform Targeted Prevention.

Stapp car crash journal·2026
Same author

Epidemiology, clinical treatment and outcomes, susceptibility patterns and genotypic analysis of 214 <i>Nocardia</i> strains from multiple centers in Henan Province.

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology·2026
Same author

Thoracic Responses of Rear-Seated Midsized Male Surrogates during Frontal Sled Tests.

Stapp car crash journal·2026
Same author

Growth charts of sutures and fontanelles for the first year of infancy.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
11:28

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials

Published on: May 18, 2015

13.0K

A Reanalysis of Experimental Brain Strain Data: Implication for Finite Element Head Model Validation.

Zhou Zhou1, Xiaogai Li1, Svein Kleiven1

  • 1Neuronic Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Stapp Car Crash Journal
|January 5, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Finite element head models validated for brain-skull motion may not accurately predict traumatic brain injury (TBI) strain. New analysis of existing data suggests models need validation against brain deformation, not just relative motion, for accurate TBI strain prediction.

More Related Videos

An Experimental and Finite Element Protocol to Investigate the Transport of Neutral and Charged Solutes across Articular Cartilage
07:57

An Experimental and Finite Element Protocol to Investigate the Transport of Neutral and Charged Solutes across Articular Cartilage

Published on: April 23, 2017

6.6K
Building Finite Element Models to Investigate Zebrafish Jaw Biomechanics
14:11

Building Finite Element Models to Investigate Zebrafish Jaw Biomechanics

Published on: December 3, 2016

10.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
11:28

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials

Published on: May 18, 2015

13.0K
An Experimental and Finite Element Protocol to Investigate the Transport of Neutral and Charged Solutes across Articular Cartilage
07:57

An Experimental and Finite Element Protocol to Investigate the Transport of Neutral and Charged Solutes across Articular Cartilage

Published on: April 23, 2017

6.6K
Building Finite Element Models to Investigate Zebrafish Jaw Biomechanics
14:11

Building Finite Element Models to Investigate Zebrafish Jaw Biomechanics

Published on: December 3, 2016

10.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Research
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI) involves complex brain deformation and brain-skull relative motion.
  • Existing finite element (FE) head models are often validated against brain-skull motion but their accuracy for predicting brain strain remains uncertain.
  • There is a significant lack of experimental data on brain deformation under injury-level loading conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate existing experimental brain strain data to improve understanding of brain deformation.
  • To test the hypothesis that FE head models validated against brain-skull relative motion do not guarantee accurate brain strain prediction.
  • To provide recommendations for validating FE head models used for TBI strain prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Recomputed incremental brain strain using updated calculations based on measured neutral density target (NDT) motion.
  • Compared the brain strain and brain-skull relative motion responses of a previously developed FE head model (Kleiven, 2007) with available experimental data.
  • Utilized Correlation and Analysis (CORA) and Normalized Integral Square Error (NISE) for model validation, alongside Pearson correlation analysis.

Main Results:

  • No significant correlations were found between experimentally measured peak brain strain and peak brain-skull relative motion.
  • No significant correlations were observed between the validation scores for brain strain and brain-skull relative motion.
  • The study found that FE head models validated solely on brain-skull relative motion may not be sufficient for accurate brain strain prediction.

Conclusions:

  • FE head models validated against brain-skull relative motion may not adequately predict brain strain relevant to TBI.
  • It is crucial to validate FE head models using experimental brain deformation data for accurate TBI strain prediction.
  • Future TBI research should prioritize FE model validation against direct brain deformation measurements.