Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats
Published on: December 8, 2014
Feasibility and indicator outcomes using computerized clinical decision support in pediatric traumatic brain injury
Ashley A Colletti1, Taniga Kiatchai1,2, Vivian H Lyons2,3
1Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Insights
Clinical decision support for pediatric traumatic brain injury anesthesia care is feasible and reliable. This system may reduce secondary insults and improve guideline adherence in pediatric anesthesia.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Neuroanesthesia
- Clinical Decision Support Systems
Background:
- Traumatic brain injury (TBI) anesthesia care in pediatric patients presents unique complexities.
- The efficacy of clinical decision support (CDS) in optimizing pediatric trauma care remains largely unexamined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of CDS for TBI anesthesia care in pediatric patients.
- To assess key performance indicators (KPIs) related to TBI anesthesia management when using CDS.
Main Methods:
- CDS was implemented for pediatric patients (<19 years) undergoing craniotomy for suspected TBI.
- Anesthesia providers received real-time alerts for process adherence and abnormal KPI events.
- Analysis included 39 cases (19 control, 20 with CDS), reviewing anesthesia records, vital signs, and alert logs.
Main Results:
- CDS demonstrated high reliability in identifying eligible cases (85% sensitivity, 100% specificity).
- The system effectively detected monitor (89%) and lab (100%) KPI events with no false positives.
- Patients managed with CDS experienced reduced median event durations for 4/7 KPIs, including significant reductions in hypocarbia, hypotension, hypothermia, and hyperthermia durations.
Conclusions:
- CDS is a feasible and reliable tool for pediatric TBI anesthesia care.
- The implementation of CDS shows potential for improving KPI outcomes and reducing secondary insults.
- CDS may serve as a valuable strategy to enhance adherence to TBI guidelines in pediatric anesthesia.
Background:
Traumatic brain injury anesthesia care is complex. The use of clinical decision support to improve pediatric trauma care has not been examined.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to examine feasibility, reliability, and key performance indicators for traumatic brain injury anesthesia care using clinical decision support.
Methods:
Clinical decision support was activated for patients under 19 years undergoing craniotomy for suspected traumatic brain injury. Anesthesia providers were prompted to adhere to process measures via on-screen alerts and notified in real time of abnormal monitor data or laboratory results (unwanted key performance indicator events). Process measures pertained to arterial line placement and blood gas draws, neuromuscular blockade, hypotension, anemia, coagulopathy, hyperglycemia, and intracranial hypertension. Unwanted key performance indicators were: hypotension, hypoxia, hypocarbia, hypercarbia, hypothermia, hyperthermia, anesthetic agent overdose; hypoxemia, coagulopathy, anemia, and hyperglycemia. Anesthesia records, vital signs, and alert logs were reviewed for 39 anesthetic cases (19 without clinical decision support and 20 with clinical decision support).
Results:
Data from 35 patients aged 11 months to 17 years and 77% males were examined. Clinical decision support reliably identified 39/46 eligible anesthetic cases, with 85% sensitivity and 100% specificity, and was highly sensitive, detecting 89% of monitor key performance indicator events and 100% of reported lab key performance indicator events. There were no false positive alerts. Median event duration was lower in the "with clinical decision support" group for 4/7 key performance indicators. Second insult duration was lower for duration of hypocarbia (by 44%), hypotension (29%), hypothermia (12%), and hyperthermia (15%).
Conclusion:
Use of clinical decision support in pediatric traumatic brain injury anesthesia care is feasible, reliable, and may have the potential to improve key performance indicator outcomes. This observational study suggests the possibility of clinical decision support as a strategy to reduce second insults and improve traumatic brain injury guideline adherence during pediatric anesthesia care.
Related Concept Videos
Indicators
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia

