Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Whole-body PET/MRI of Pediatric Patients: The Details That Matter
Published on: December 19, 2017
Cranioplasty after craniectomy in pediatric patients-a systematic review
Vita M Klieverik1, Kai J Miller1, Ash Singhal2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, room G03.124, 3484, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Insights
Complications are common after pediatric cranioplasty using bone grafts or implants. More research is needed to improve surgical strategies and patient outcomes for cranioplasty in children.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Pediatric Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Cranioplasty is frequently performed in pediatric patients following craniectomy.
- Complications associated with both autografts and cranial implants are common.
- Current literature lacks comprehensive data on cranioplasty strategies, complications, and long-term outcomes in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the existing literature on cranioplasty practices in pediatric patients.
- To provide an overview of current cranioplasty strategies, common complications, and reported outcomes.
- To identify gaps in the literature and highlight the need for future research.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature review was conducted for articles published up to July 2018.
- Studies included pediatric patients (<18 years) undergoing cranioplasty with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
- Data on cranioplasty materials, complications, and revision rates were extracted and analyzed.
Main Results:
- The review analyzed 24 manuscripts detailing 864 cranioplasty procedures in children (average age 8.0 years).
- Autologous bone grafts (56.0%) and cranial implants (44.0%) were utilized, with resorption and infection being common complications for grafts, and infection/migration for implants.
- Significant data gaps were identified regarding complication and revision rates for both methods, hindering comparative analysis.
Conclusions:
- Post-cranioplasty complications are frequent in pediatric patients, irrespective of the material used (autografts or implants).
- The current body of literature lacks standardized, well-documented outcome parameters for cranioplasty in children.
- Prospective, long-term, multicenter cohort studies are essential to optimize cranioplasty strategies and improve outcomes for pediatric patients.
Introduction:
Complications following cranioplasty with either autografts or cranial implants are commonly reported in pediatric patients. However, data regarding cranioplasty strategies, complications and long-term outcomes are not well described. This study systematically reviews the literature for an overview of current cranioplasty practice in children.
Methods:
A systematic review of articles published from inception to July 2018 was performed. Studies were included if they reported the specific use of cranioplasty materials following craniectomy in patients younger than 18 years of age, and had a minimum follow-up of at least 1 year.
Results:
Twenty-four manuscripts, describing a total of 864 cranioplasty procedures, met the inclusion criteria. The age of patients in this aggregate ranged from 1 month to 20 years and the weighted average was 8.0 years. The follow-up ranged from 0.4 months to 18 years and had a weighted average of 40.4 months. Autologous bone grafts were used in 484 cases (56.0%). Resorption, infection and/or hydrocephalus were the most frequently mentioned complications. In this aggregate group, 61 patients needed a revision cranioplasty. However, in 6/13 (46%) papers studying autologous cranioplasties, no data was provided on resorption, infection and revision cranioplasty rates. Cranial implants were used in 380 cases (44.0%), with custom-made porous hydroxyapatite being the most commonly used material (100/380, 26.3%). Infection and migration/fracturing/loosening were the most frequently documented complications. Eleven revision cranioplasties were reported. Again, no data was reported on infection and revision cranioplasty rates, in 7/16 (44%) and 9/16 (56%) of papers, respectively.
Conclusion:
Our systematic review illuminates that whether autografts or cranial implants are used, postcranioplasty complications are quite common. Beyond this, the existing literature does not contain well documented and comparable outcome parameters, suggesting that prospective, long-term multicenter cohort studies are needed to be able to optimize cranioplasty strategies in children who will undergo cranioplasty following craniectomy.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview

