Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion01:22

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion

575
In the context of a rigid body's movement within a general plane, it is important to understand that this motion is typically triggered by external forces or couple moments exerted onto it. This principle can be explained through Newton's second law, which stipulates the translational motion of the body's center of mass along each axis.
Moreover, the body's center of mass experiences a rotational effect as a result of these couple moments. This rotation can be articulated as the...
575
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

563
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
563
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion - Problem Solving01:16

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion - Problem Solving

505
Consider a lawn roller with a mass of 100 kg, a radius of 0.2 meters, and a radius of gyration of 0.15 meters. A force of 200 N is applied to this roller, angled at 60 degrees from the horizontal plane. What will be the angular acceleration of the lawn roller?
The friction between the roller and the ground is characterized by two coefficients. The static friction coefficient is 0.15, while the kinetic friction coefficient is 0.1. These values are crucial in understanding the interaction between...
505
Projectile Motion: Example01:18

Projectile Motion: Example

12.8K
The theory of projectile motion is very useful for players of several sports to improve their performance. For example, a javelin thrower needs to throw their javelin in such a way that it travels as far as possible. The javelin thrower takes a short run-up to increase the initial speed of the javelin. The range of a projectile is at its maximum at a 45° angle so javelin throwers try to angle their throw as close to 45° as possible.
When we speak of the range (R) of a projectile on...
12.8K
Simple Harmonic Motion and Uniform Circular Motion01:42

Simple Harmonic Motion and Uniform Circular Motion

5.6K
While simple harmonic motion and uniform circular motion may be two separate concepts, they correlate and interlink with each other. Simple harmonic motion is an oscillatory motion in a system where the net force can be described by Hooke's law, while uniform circular motion is the motion of an object in a circular path at constant speed.
There is an easy way to produce simple harmonic motion by using uniform circular motion. For instance, consider a ball attached to a uniformly rotating...
5.6K
Torque Free Motion01:15

Torque Free Motion

809
The torque-free motion refers to the movement of a rigid body in space when no external torques are acting upon it. This type of motion can be observed in environments where there are no external forces or frictions, like in outer space. For example, a rotation of Mars in space is a torque-free motion. Mars is an axisymmetric object, meaning it has an axis of symmetry along which it rotates, designated as the z-axis. The rotating frame of reference is defined such that the center of mass of...
809

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New insights and a computational model for understanding induced motion revealed through novel variants of the Flying Bluebottle Illusion.

i-Perception·2025
Same author

Comparison of tripolar and traditional EEG recording of the visual evoked potential.

Vision research·2025
Same author

Invalid Trials Are Not Required to Observe Neural Correlates of Object-based Attention in Retinotopic Visual Cortex.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Self-Awareness from Whole-Body Movements.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Linguistic Empathy: Behavioral measures, neurophysiological correlates, and correlation with Psychological Empathy.

Neuropsychologia·2023
Same author

The Architecture of Object-Based Attention.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.7K

Interactions of flicker and motion.

Gennady Erlikhman1, Sion Gutentag2, Christopher D Blair3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, United States; Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.

Vision Research
|January 7, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Flickering stimuli can create illusions of motion, including apparent movement of stationary objects (Flicker Induced Motion) and suppression of actual motion. These flicker-motion interactions are prominent in peripheral vision and are not solely explained by eye movements.

Keywords:
FlickerInduced motionMotion groupingMotion suppression

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.2K
Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.7K
Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.2K
Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Motion perception
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Flicker, defined as alternating changes in luminance or color, is a common visual stimulus.
  • Interactions between flicker and motion perception are not fully understood.
  • Existing models may not fully capture the complex relationship between these phenomena.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate novel perceptual effects arising from interactions between flicker and motion.
  • To characterize the stimulus parameters influencing these flicker-motion interactions.
  • To differentiate flicker-induced motion from motion caused by eye movements.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted four psychophysical experiments.
  • Systematically varied flicker rates, object motion, and stimulus location (central vs. peripheral).
  • Utilized luminance and isoluminant color flicker, and varied the number of moving objects.

Main Results:

  • Identified three distinct effects: Flicker Induced Motion (FLIM), Flicker Induced Motion Suppression (FLIMS), and Flicker-Induced Induced-Motion (FLIIM).
  • Observed strongest interactions in peripheral vision and at flicker frequencies above 10 Hz.
  • Demonstrated that induced motion effects are not fully explained by eye movements, as stationary objects could appear to move independently.

Conclusions:

  • Flicker significantly influences motion perception, creating illusions of movement and suppressing actual motion.
  • The spatial and temporal dynamics of flicker are critical in modulating motion perception.
  • These findings underscore the intricate relationship between flicker and motion processing in the visual system.