Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
Published on: August 21, 2021
Measurement of dust-borne MRSA in pig farms using different approaches
A M Madsen1, A Markouch1, M W Frederiksen1
1The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Aims:
To obtain knowledge about (i) how to sample airborne methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and dust in the pig farm environment including effects of sampler on (a) measured exposure, (b) MRSA survival and (c) spatial and temporal variation in exposure, and (ii) the association between exposure to MRSA, dust and optical density OD.
Methods And Results:
Airborne dust was sampled on five pig farms using five active and one passive samplers. Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA (as a subset of S. aureus) were quantified using selective agar media and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The Andersen sampler, electrostatic dust collectors (EDC), and Gesamtstaubprobenahme (GSP) and Institute of Occupational Medicine samplers with polycarbonate or Teflon filters were applicable for sampling airborne MRSA. The half-life of MRSA was not reduced by active sampling. A significant correlation was found between dust and S. aureus exposure within, but not between, farm section and farms. A significant spatial and temporal variation in dust and MRSA exposure was found within a stable. The dust sampling rate and the concentration of MRSA in the sampled dust decreased after 5 days of sampling.
Conclusion:
Sampling using the GSP can be performed for 1 h without affecting the following half-life of MRSA. Sampling for MRSA using the EDC should not exceed 3 days due to overloading and the die-off of MRSA. The measurement of OD may be used as a proxy measure for dust exposure. To obtain knowledge about potential exposure, samples should be taken repeatedly and in different areas within a stable section.
Significance And Impact Of The Study:
Sampling method, sampling time and number of samples taken, but not force of airflow on the filter, influence the measured potential exposure to MRSA and dust.
Insights
This study evaluated airborne methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and dust sampling methods on pig farms. Optimal sampling strategies are crucial for accurate exposure assessment and understanding MRSA transmission dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Environmental microbiology
- Occupational hygiene
- Veterinary public health
Background:
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a significant risk in agricultural settings, particularly on pig farms.
- Understanding airborne exposure to MRSA and dust is critical for implementing effective control measures and protecting worker health.
- Previous research has limitations in standardizing sampling methods for airborne pathogens in farm environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess various sampling techniques for airborne MRSA and dust in pig farm environments.
- To investigate the impact of different samplers on MRSA exposure measurements, survival, and spatial-temporal variations.
- To determine the association between MRSA, dust exposure, and optical density (OD) as a potential proxy measure.
Main Methods:
- Airborne dust and MRSA were sampled on five pig farms using five active and one passive sampler.
- MRSA was quantified using selective agar media and MALDI-TOF MS.
- Applicable samplers included Andersen, electrostatic dust collectors (EDC), and Gesamtstaubprobenahme (GSP) with various filters.
Main Results:
- The Andersen sampler, EDC, and GSP were suitable for sampling airborne MRSA.
- No significant reduction in MRSA half-life was observed with active sampling.
- Significant spatial and temporal variations in dust and MRSA exposure were found within stables, with correlations between dust and S. aureus exposure within farm sections.
Conclusions:
- The GSP sampler can be used for 1-hour sampling without affecting MRSA half-life.
- EDC sampling for MRSA should not exceed 3 days due to overloading and MRSA die-off.
- Optical density (OD) measurements may serve as a proxy for dust exposure, and repeated sampling in different areas is recommended for comprehensive exposure assessment.
Related Concept Videos
The Born-Haber Cycle
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Information Processing Approach
The Nativist Approach
Kaplan-Meier Approach

