Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The "Quantifying Construct Validity" Procedure: Its Role, Value, Interpretations, and Computation.

R Michael Furr1, Sarah Heuckeroth1

  • 11 Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Assessment
|January 8, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A largely univariate framework for understanding multivariate analysis of variance.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Patience and Patience Regulation: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Complementary Scales with Alternate Forms.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same author

Assessing the Response Process Validity of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory Using Cognitive Interviews.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same author

Using Generative Artificial Intelligence to Advance Hypothesis-Driven Scale Validation: Identifying Criterion Measures and Generating Precise a Priori Hypotheses.

Assessment·2025
Same author

Is Doing Good Good Enough? A Motivation, Action, Sacrifice, and Temptation (MAST) View of Moral Praiseworthiness.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2024
Same author

Truthfulness Predominates in Americans' Conceptualizations of Honesty: A Prototype Analysis.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2023
Same journal

Modeling Individual Language Patterns and Psychological Constructs to Generate AI-Augmented Data for Scalable Psychological Assessment.

Assessment·2026
Same journal

The Psychometric Properties of the Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI) in Sexual and Gender Minority Adults: Minority Stress and Resilience Correlates of Positive and Negative Emotion Regulation Difficulties.

Assessment·2026
Same journal

Future Orientation Scale: A Psychometric Evaluation Across Health-Vulnerable Samples.

Assessment·2026
Same journal

Spurious Reliability Increase?: The Number of Response Options in the Likert-Type Scale Influences Only Internal Consistency, Not Criterion Validity.

Assessment·2026
Same journal

Measuring Moral Injury Outcome and Distress in High-Risk Populations in Germany: A Validation Study.

Assessment·2026
Same journal

Establishing Psychometric Validity of the PBSS-20 for Sexual Minority College Students.

Assessment·2026
See all related articles

This study improves test validation by clarifying the Quantifying Construct Validity (QCV) procedure. Recommendations are provided to enhance its use in systematically evaluating validity correlations against hypotheses.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Educational Measurement
  • Psychological Assessment

Background:

  • The Quantifying Construct Validity (QCV) procedure offers a systematic approach to evaluating construct validity in test validation.
  • Limited adoption and accuracy of QCV may stem from conceptual ambiguities, unclear utility, and lack of software integration.
  • Addressing these limitations is crucial for advancing psychometric practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance the test validation process by refining the Quantifying Construct Validity (QCV) procedure.
  • To clarify key concepts and improve the utility and application of QCV in research.
  • To provide psychometrically grounded recommendations for the accurate computation and use of QCV.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and conceptual analysis of the Quantifying Construct Validity (QCV) procedure.
Keywords:
R statistical softwareconstruct validityconvergent validitydiscriminant validitypsychometricsquantifying construct validitytest validity

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of psychometrically sound recommendations for applying QCV.
  • Discussion of integration strategies with statistical software for broader accessibility.

    • Main Results:

    • Clarification of the role and utility of QCV in test validation.
    • Enhanced understanding of core concepts within the QCV framework.
    • Guidelines for improved computation and application of QCV, addressing previous limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • The enhanced understanding and application of QCV will improve the rigor of test validation.
    • This work facilitates more objective and systematic evaluation of construct validity.
    • Recommendations aim to increase the frequency and accuracy of QCV use in psychometric research.