Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Fine-tuning the Size and Minimizing the Noise of Solid-state Nanopores
Published on: October 31, 2013
Coding-in-Noise Deficits are Not Seen in Responses to Amplitude Modulation in Subjects with cochlear Synaptopathy
Hengchao Chen1, Yazhi Xing1, Zhen Zhang1
1Otolaryngology Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Abstract:
Since the first report of noise-induced synaptic damage in animals without permanent threshold shifts (PTSs), the concept of noise-induced hidden hearing loss (NIHHL) has been proposed to cover the functional deficits in hearing associated with noise-induced synaptopathy. Moreover, the potential functional deficit associated with the noise-induced synaptopathy has been largely attributed to the loss of auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) with a low spontaneous spike rate (SSR). As this group of ANFs is critical for coding at suprathreshold levels and in noisy background, coding-in-noise deficit (CIND) has been considered to be main consequence of the synaptopathy. However, such deficits have not been verified after a single, brief exposure to noise without PTS. In the present study, synaptopathy was generated by such noise exposure in both mice and guinea pigs. Responses to amplitude modulation (AM) were recorded at a high sound level in combination with masking to evaluate the existence of CINDs that might be associated with loss of low-SSR ANFs. An overall reduction in response amplitude was seen in AM-evoked compound action potential (CAP). However, no such reduction was seen in the scalp-recorded envelope following response (EFR), suggesting a compensation due to increased central gain. Moreover, there was no significant difference in masking effect between the control and noise groups. The results suggest that either there is no significant CIND after the synaptopathy we created, or the AM response tested with our protocol was not sufficiently sensitive to detect such a deficit; far-field EFR is not sensitive to cochlear pathology.
More Related Videos
06:22Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro
Published on: August 28, 2019
07:13Modified Experimental Conditions for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice and Assessment of Hearing Function and Outer Hair Cell Damage
Published on: February 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs
lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs
Pulse amplitude and quality
A weak or absent pulse may indicate reduced cardiac output or poor left ventricular contraction, which can be signs of cardiovascular dysfunction or...
Nursing Code of Ethics
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Cable Subjected to Its Own Weight
A generalized loading function is employed to analyze a cable subjected to its own weight. This function considers the force acting along the cable's arc length rather than its projected length, providing a more accurate...