Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
Published on: December 15, 2023
A comparison of deep networks with ReLU activation function and linear spline-type methods
Konstantin Eckle1, Johannes Schmidt-Hieber1
1Leiden University, Mathematical Institute, Niels Bohrweg 1, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Deep neural networks (DNNs) offer superior function approximation capabilities compared to shallow networks. This study demonstrates DNNs can learn complex functions, matching or exceeding the performance of multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and spline-based methods.
Area of Science:
- Machine Learning
- Computational Theory
- Numerical Analysis
Background:
- Deep neural networks (DNNs) possess richer function spaces than shallow networks, but the theoretical reasons for their success remain debated.
- Shallow network function spaces exhibit approximation-theoretic drawbacks, necessitating further investigation into the advantages of deep architectures.
- Understanding the expressive power of DNNs is crucial for advancing machine learning theory and practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the function approximation capabilities of deep neural networks (DNNs) with ReLU activation to linear spline methods.
- To establish theoretical bounds on the learnability of functions represented by MARS and Faber-Schauder systems using DNNs.
- To derive risk comparison inequalities between DNNs and spline-based methods to quantify their relative statistical performance.
Main Methods:
- Demonstrated that multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) are 'improperly learnable' by DNNs, showing DNNs can approximate MARS functions with a specific parameter complexity.
- Extended this learnability result to functions expanded with respect to the Faber-Schauder system.
- Derived risk comparison inequalities to bound the statistical risk of fitting neural networks relative to spline-based methods.
Main Results:
- A constructive proof shows that for any MARS function with M parameters, a DNN with O(Mlog(M∕ε)) parameters can approximate it within sup-norm error ε.
- Similar approximation guarantees were established for Faber-Schauder system expansions.
- Derived risk inequalities indicate that deep networks perform comparably to or better than the analyzed spline methods in terms of statistical risk.
Conclusions:
- Deep neural networks (DNNs) possess significant function approximation power, theoretically matching or surpassing traditional spline-based methods.
- The study provides a theoretical foundation for the success of deep learning by linking its expressive power to established approximation theory.
- These findings suggest that deep networks offer a competitive or superior alternative to spline methods for complex function approximation tasks.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Types of Functions I
Network Function of a Circuit
Types of Functions II
T Cell Types and Functions
Th1 cells stimulate dendritic cells to express necessary co-stimulatory molecules on their surfaces for...
Types of Functions III

