The Evolution and the Advantages of MicroED

Brent L Nannenga1, Guanhong Bu1, Dan Shi2

  • 1School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.

Insights

Microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) offers high-resolution protein structure determination by integrating cryo-EM and crystallography. This review covers MicroED

Area of Science:

  • Structural Biology
  • Biophysics
  • Crystallography

Background:

  • Microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) combines cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) sample preparation with crystallography data analysis.
  • Initial concerns regarding MicroED focused on dynamic electron scattering inaccuracies.
  • MicroED has successfully determined numerous high-resolution protein crystal structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the advancements in MicroED data collection and processing techniques.
  • To discuss the nuances of multiple scattering in protein crystals versus inorganic materials.
  • To highlight the benefits of continuous rotation data collection in MicroED.

Main Methods:

  • Review of MicroED data collection strategies, including continuous rotation.
  • Analysis of electron scattering phenomena in crystalline samples.
  • Comparison of radiation doses in MicroED versus single-particle cryo-EM.

Main Results:

  • Electron scattering inaccuracies have been largely overcome through refined MicroED methods.
  • Continuous rotation data collection offers significant advantages for MicroED.
  • MicroED enables lower radiation doses due to the crystalline nature of samples, facilitating radiation damage studies.

Conclusions:

  • MicroED is a powerful technique for high-resolution structure determination of protein crystals.
  • Understanding and mitigating multiple scattering effects are crucial for accurate MicroED data.
  • The low-dose capabilities of MicroED are valuable for investigating radiation sensitivity in biological macromolecules.

Related Concept Videos

The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
48.1K
Convergent Evolution01:54

Convergent Evolution

Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
32.8K
Eukaryotic Evolution01:24

Eukaryotic Evolution

The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
41.1K
Synteny and Evolution02:31

Synteny and Evolution

John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.8K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

3.7K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
8.2K