Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Use of Two Intracorporeal Ventricular Assist Devices As a Total Artificial Heart
Published on: May 11, 2018
Impact of Previous Sternotomy on Outcome after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
Konstantin Zhigalov1, Marcin Szczechowicz1, Ahmed Mashhour1
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Klinikum Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Insights
Previous sternotomy significantly impacts left ventricular assist device (LVAD) outcomes. Patients with prior sternotomy experienced lower survival rates and increased complications, including device-related issues and organ dysfunction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Previous sternotomy is a common surgical history for patients requiring advanced heart failure therapy.
- Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) are crucial for end-stage heart failure management.
- The influence of prior sternotomy on LVAD outcomes requires detailed investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of previous sternotomy (PS) on the outcomes of patients receiving three distinct types of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).
- To compare survival rates and adverse event profiles between LVAD recipients with and without a history of sternotomy.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 121 patients implanted with HeartMate II, HeartWare, or HeartMate III LVADs between June 2007 and February 2018.
- Patients were categorized into previous sternotomy (PS) and non-PS groups.
- Propensity score matching created 44 comparable patient pairs for analysis of primary (overall survival) and secondary (adverse events) endpoints.
Main Results:
- Overall survival rates were significantly lower in the PS group compared to the non-PS group at 1, 2, and 5 years post-implantation (p=0.036).
- The PS group exhibited a higher incidence of intraoperative short-term right ventricular assist device implantation (22.7% vs 6.8%, p=0.034).
- Increased rates of hepatic dysfunction (20.5% vs 4.5%, p=0.025) and acute kidney dysfunction (40.9% vs 20.5%, p=0.032) were observed in the PS group.
Conclusions:
- Previous sternotomy is a significant predictor of increased mortality and morbidity following LVAD implantation.
- The findings underscore the importance of considering prior sternotomy in risk stratification and perioperative management of LVAD candidates.
Background:
The main purpose of this article is to investigate the impact of previous sternotomy (PS) on the outcome of three different left ventricular assist devices (LVAD).
Methods:
Between June 2007 and February 2018, a total of 121 patients received HeartMate II (60.3%), HeartWare (12.4%), or HeartMate III (27.3%), with or without previous sternotomy (PS and non-PS groups, respectively). Propensity matching resulted in 44 patient pairs. The primary end point was overall survival at 30 days, 1 year, 2, and 5 years, postoperatively. Secondary end points were adverse events.
Results:
The overall cumulative survival rates for the two study groups were significantly different (77, 63, 54, and 38% for non-PS group vs 64, 39, 27, and 24% for PS group, p = 0.036). In the PS group, there was a higher need for intraoperative implantation of short-term right ventricular assist device (22.7 vs 6.8%, p = 0.034) and a higher incidence of hepatic dysfunction (20.5 vs 4.5%, p = 0.025) and acute kidney dysfunction (40.9 vs 20.5%, p = 0.032).
Conclusion:
PS is a reliable predictor of mortality and morbidity after LVAD implantation.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Impact of Groups on Groups
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Impact
When particles with different initial velocities collide, they induce deformation by applying equal and opposite impulses. At the point of maximum deformation, the particles move together with...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Impact of Groups on Individuals

