Related Experiment Videos
1FSBO National Medical research center of cardiology of the Ministry of healthcare of the Russian Federation. fake@neicon.ru.
Kardiologiia
|January 10, 2019
Summary
Patients with mid-range ejection fraction (EF) heart failure (HF) respond well to beta-blockers and RAAS inhibitors, unlike those with preserved EF. A new HF classification should include clinical phenotype for better treatment guidance.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) classification traditionally categorizes patients based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) into reduced (<40%), mid-range (40-49%), and preserved (≥50%) groups.
- Patients with mid-range LVEF exhibit heterogeneous clinical and demographic characteristics, often occupying an intermediate position between reduced and preserved LVEF groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical expediency of a separate classification subgroup for heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction (40-49%).
- To analyze the treatment response and etiological differences within the mid-range LVEF subgroup compared to reduced and preserved LVEF groups.
- To advocate for a revised HF classification incorporating clinical phenotype alongside LVEF.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of studies published between 2017-2018 focusing on patients with mid-range LVEF.
- Comparison of clinical and demographic parameters, treatment responses (beta-blockers, RAAS inhibitors), and etiological factors (ischemic vs. non-ischemic phenotypes) across different LVEF groups.
Main Results:
- Patients with mid-range LVEF demonstrate a positive response to beta-blocker and RAAS inhibitor therapy, similar to patients with reduced LVEF.
- This therapeutic response differs significantly from patients with preserved LVEF, who typically do not benefit from these treatments.
- Etiology plays a key role, with ischemic heart disease prevalent in reduced and mid-range LVEF, while non-cardiac causes are more common in preserved LVEF.
Conclusions:
- The mid-range LVEF subgroup is clinically distinct and warrants separate consideration.
- The positive response to specific therapies in mid-range LVEF suggests a pathogenesis more aligned with reduced LVEF, primarily linked to ischemic heart disease.
- A comprehensive HF classification should integrate clinical phenotype (e.g., ischemic vs. non-ischemic) with LVEF, especially for the heterogeneous mid-range group, to guide therapeutic strategies.