Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Paddy Field by Means of Static Closed Chambers Maintaining Plants Within Headspace
Published on: September 6, 2018
[Effects of the Crop Rotation on Greenhouse Gases from Flooded Paddy Fields]
Xi Feng1, Chang-Sheng Jiang1, Xiao-le Peng1
1Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China.
Abstract:
A field experiment was conducted at the Key Field Station for Monitoring Eco-environment of Purple Soil of the Ministry of Agriculture of China in the farm of Southwest University, Chongqing. The static chamber and gas chromatography method was used to study the effect of the cropping systems on greenhouse gases from rice-fallow (RF), rice-rapeseed rotation (RR), and rice-brussel mustard rotation (RV) cropland in situ for a year. An opaque chamber was used for CH4 and N2O observations and a transparent chamber was utilized for CO2 observations. The results show that the annual cumulative CH4 emissions from different crop rotations were (CH4, kg·hm-2) RF (422.87±27.1) > RR (132.05±23.11) > RV (50.91±3.83). The RV and RR were significantly lower than RF (P<0.05). The annual cumulative emissions of N2O[N2O, kg·hm-2] were RV (21.38±6.51) > RR (20.02±5.23) > RF (0.48±0.02). The RV and RR were significantly higher than RF (P<0.05). The annual net cumulative emissions of CO2 were (CO2, t·hm-2) RR (-55.43±5.04) > RV (-29.1±3.00) > RF (-14.08±1.81). The RV and RR were significantly higher than RF (P<0.05). At the time scale of 100 a, the integrated global warming potentials (GWP) of CH4, N2O, and CO2 were (CO2, t·hm-2)RR(-46.43) > RV(-22.01) > RF(-2.11), indicating that converting flooded paddy fields to paddy-upland crop rotation systems notably increases the potential increment of carbon sinks. Compared with RV, RR has a better effect, which suggests that rice-rapeseed rotation is the most effective measure for the escalation of carbon sinks of ecosystems in the southwestern area.
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Noble Gases
The elements in group 18 are noble gases (helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, and radon). They earned the name “noble” because they were assumed to be nonreactive since they have filled valence shells. In 1962, Dr. Neil Bartlett at the University of British Columbia proved this assumption to be false.
Real Gases: Effects of Intermolecular Forces and Molecular Volume Deriving Van der Waals Equation
Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids
Mixtures of Gases: Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures and Mole Fractions
Speed of Sound in Gases

