Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Electrochemiluminescence Assays for Human Islet Autoantibodies
Published on: March 23, 2018
Predicting progression to type 1 diabetes from ages 3 to 6 in islet autoantibody positive TEDDY children
Laura M Jacobsen1, Helena E Larsson2, Roy N Tamura3
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Insights
Predicting type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children is challenging. A new risk algorithm using clinical, genetic, and autoantibody data shows promise for early T1D prediction in high-risk children.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Genetics
- Precision Medicine
Background:
- Type 1 diabetes (T1D) prediction in young children remains a significant clinical challenge.
- Early identification of children at high risk for T1D is crucial for timely intervention.
- The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study provides a valuable cohort for investigating T1D progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a risk prediction algorithm for T1D progression in children with high-risk human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes.
- To identify key clinical, immunologic, metabolic, and genetic predictors of T1D development.
- To compare the performance of a logistic regression model against simpler prediction methods.
Main Methods:
- Logistic regression and 4-fold cross-validation were employed to analyze 38 candidate predictors.
- The study focused on TEDDY participants with at least one persistent autoantibody at age 3, with T1D by age 6 as the primary endpoint.
- The developed model was compared to predictions based on multiple autoantibody status and insulinoma-associated-2 autoantibodies (IA-2A) presence.
Main Results:
- A total of 363 subjects with autoantibodies at age 3 were analyzed; 21% progressed to T1D by age 6.
- Five significant predictors were identified: IA-2A status, hemoglobin A1c, BMI Z-score, SNP rs12708716_G, and a combined autoantibody/fasting insulin marker.
- The logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.80, outperforming simpler predictors, though differences in performance metrics were marginal.
Conclusions:
- Precision medicine approaches can enhance T1D progression prediction in children over a 3-year timeframe.
- The developed multifaceted model offers a preliminary improvement over existing prediction tools.
- Further research and additional predictive tools are necessary to optimize T1D risk assessment.
Objective:
The capacity to precisely predict progression to type 1 diabetes (T1D) in young children over a short time span is an unmet need. We sought to develop a risk algorithm to predict progression in children with high-risk human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes followed in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study.
Methods:
Logistic regression and 4-fold cross-validation examined 38 candidate predictors of risk from clinical, immunologic, metabolic, and genetic data. TEDDY subjects with at least one persistent, confirmed autoantibody at age 3 were analyzed with progression to T1D by age 6 serving as the primary endpoint. The logistic regression prediction model was compared to two non-statistical predictors, multiple autoantibody status, and presence of insulinoma-associated-2 autoantibodies (IA-2A).
Results:
A total of 363 subjects had at least one autoantibody at age 3. Twenty-one percent of subjects developed T1D by age 6. Logistic regression modeling identified 5 significant predictors - IA-2A status, hemoglobin A1c, body mass index Z-score, single-nucleotide polymorphism rs12708716_G, and a combination marker of autoantibody number plus fasting insulin level. The logistic model yielded a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80, higher than the two other predictors; however, the differences in AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were small across models.
Conclusions:
This study highlights the application of precision medicine techniques to predict progression to diabetes over a 3-year window in TEDDY subjects. This multifaceted model provides preliminary improvement in prediction over simpler prediction tools. Additional tools are needed to maximize the predictive value of these approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Positive Regulator Molecules
Predicting Molecular Geometry

