Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
Published on: March 8, 2024
Comparison of the effects of different growth standards on infants in Urban Shanghai: a cluster-randomized controlled
Jun-Li Wang1,2, Jing-Qiu Ma1,2, Ming-Yu Xu1,2
1Department of Child and Adolescent Healthcare, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Insights
Adopting World Health Organization (WHO) 2006 growth standards, instead of Shanghai growth standards, significantly reduced infant overweight risk up to one year of age in Shanghai. This finding is crucial for preventing childhood obesity.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Growth Monitoring
Background:
- Shanghai growth standards are higher than WHO standards, potentially increasing infant overweight risk.
- Caregiver feeding practices may be influenced by differing growth standards, impacting infant weight.
- Childhood obesity is a growing concern in urban populations, necessitating effective growth monitoring strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the impact of Shanghai and WHO 2006 growth standards on infant overweight risk.
- To evaluate differences in infant growth parameters (z-scores) based on growth standards used.
- To inform public health policies regarding optimal growth monitoring for early childhood obesity prevention.
Main Methods:
- Cluster-randomized controlled trial in Shanghai involving 19 community health centers (November 2013 - December 2015).
- Infants monitored using either Shanghai (S-group) or WHO 2006 (W-group) growth standards.
- Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ), length-for-age z-score (LAZ), and weight-for-length z-score (WLZ) assessed, with overweight prevalence compared.
Main Results:
- Overweight ratios were significantly higher in the S-group at 9 months (4.3% vs 3.4%) and 12 months (3.8% vs 2.2%) compared to the W-group.
- Infants in the S-group showed significantly greater increases in WAZ and WLZ, and a decrease in LAZ, relative to the W-group.
- Statistically significant differences were observed in overweight prevalence and z-score changes between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- Adoption of WHO 2006 growth standards is recommended to reduce infant overweight risk in Shanghai.
- Implementing WHO growth standards can mitigate the risk of developing childhood obesity up to one year of age.
- Standardizing growth monitoring with WHO criteria may improve early detection and prevention of infant overweight.
Background:
The Shanghai growth standards are higher than World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards, which may influence the feeding practices of the caregivers and increase the risk of overweight in these infants. This study aimed to compare the effects of different growth standards on childhood obesity in Shanghai metropolitan area.
Methods:
This was a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in 2 downtown areas with 19 community health service centers in Shanghai from November 2013 to December 2015. Randomization was done at the level of the community. Infants (health newborns) were assessed and monitored by the Shanghai growth standards (S-group) and the 2006 WHO growth standards (W-group), respectively. Measurements were taken at 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 9.0 and 12.0 months of age during follow-up period. Based on the values of length and weight measurements, according to the group's growth standards, doctors provided the caregivers with corresponding clinical consultation. Changes in weight-for-age z-score (WAZ), length-for-age z-score (LAZ), and weight-for length z-score (WLZ) between 2 groups were assessed using mixed regression models. Overweight was compared between 2 group at all follow-up measurements.
Results:
A total of 6509 infants (52.1% were boys) were in the W-group, and 8510 infants (51.4% were boys) were in the S-group. The overweight ratios between two groups were distinct at 9 months of age (3.4% in W-group and 4.3% in S-group) and 12 months of age (2.2% in W-group and 3.8% in S-group), and the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.020 and P < 0.001, respectively). Compared to W-group, the increase in WAZ (coefficient = 0.04, P = 0.004) and WLZ (coefficient = 0.09, P < 0.001) were significantly greater, and the LAZ was lower (coefficient = -0.04, P = 0.047) in S-group (W-group values were used as reference in mixed regression models).
Conclusion:
Compared to the Shanghai growth standards, the adoption of WHO 2006 growth standards would reduce the risk of infant overweight in Shanghai metropolitan area up to 1 year of age.
Trial Registration Number:
ChiCTR1800015371, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Temperature
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Random Error

