Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical complexities in assessing patients' insight.

Laura Guidry-Grimes

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |January 12, 2019
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Dismantling Ableism in Undergraduate Medical Education: Promising Practices in Disability-Conscious Training.

    Teaching and learning in medicine·2025
    Same author

    State-Mandated Ethics Oversight Is Inappropriate for Gender-Affirming Care.

    The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2025
    Same author

    What Does Disability Justice Require of Antimicrobial Stewardship?

    AMA journal of ethics·2024
    Same author

    The Ethics and Practice of Communicating a Malnutrition Diagnosis.

    Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics·2023
    Same author

    Reframing Mental Health Ethics.

    Community mental health journal·2023
    Same author

    Smuggled Doughnuts and Forbidden Fried Chicken: Addressing Tensions around Family and Food Restrictions in Hospitals.

    The Hastings Center report·2023
    Same journal

    Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics briefing.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Medical ethics and categorisation.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Assessing patient insight into mental illness lacks consensus, raising ethical concerns. Recommendations aim to support patients and preserve their trust in therapeutic relationships.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Bioethics

    Background:

    • Clinical insight, or a patient's awareness of their mental illness, is crucial in psychiatric care.
    • Current understanding views insight as multidimensional but lacks consensus on specifics.
    • Contradictory evidence exists regarding the prevalence and impact of poor insight.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore theoretical disagreements regarding the definition of clinical insight.
    • To highlight under-addressed ethical issues in assessing patient insight.
    • To propose recommendations for supporting patients with poor insight.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of theoretical conceptions of insight.
    • Analysis of ethical implications of insight assessments.
    Keywords:
    psychiatry

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of recommendations for clinical practice.
  • Main Results:

    • Significant conceptual ambiguities and lack of standardized tools for assessing insight.
    • Ethical concerns include marginalizing patients and minimizing their perspectives.
    • Recommendations focus on documentation and support to maintain epistemic trust.

    Conclusions:

    • Conceptual ambiguities in defining insight create ethical challenges in assessment.
    • Insight assessments risk undermining patient autonomy and trust.
    • Improved practices are needed to support patients and their therapeutic relationships.