Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

15:04
A Neuronal and Astrocyte Co-Culture Assay for High Content Analysis of Neurotoxicity
Published on: May 5, 2009
25.8K
The Content Validity of the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI)
Behnam Shariati1, Amir-Abbas Keshavarz-Akhlaghi2, Arash Mohammadzadeh2
1Mental Health Research Center, Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Psychiatry Journal
|January 12, 2019
Summary
The Cultural Formulation Interview shows acceptable, though weak, content validity in Persian. Further research is needed for cultural perception and help-seeking domains in Iran.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Cross-cultural psychology
- Mental health assessment
Background:
- The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) includes the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) to address cultural factors in psychiatric diagnoses.
- Assessing the validity of diagnostic tools across different cultural contexts is crucial for equitable mental healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the content validity of the open-ended items within the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) from the DSM-5.
- To evaluate the CFI's suitability for use within the Iranian population.
Main Methods:
- The CFI was translated into Persian, with content validity assessed and items modified by psychiatrists.
- A back-translation process was conducted by two translators.
- The Persian version and its back-translation were submitted for approval to the DSM-5 design workshop.
- Content validity was examined using panel members.
Main Results:
- The overall content validity index (CVI) for the Cultural Formulation Interview was 0.51.
- All items were deemed acceptable.
- Specific items related to cultural perception of context and cultural factors affecting help-seeking exhibited lower content validity ratios (CVR).
Conclusions:
- The Cultural Formulation Interview demonstrates overall acceptable, albeit weak, content validity in its Persian translation.
- Further studies are recommended to strengthen the validity of items concerning cultural perception of context and help-seeking factors within the Iranian population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
3.9K
A nursing diagnosis is written when the nurse recognizes a cluster of essential patient data indicating health problems treated with independent nursing interventions. The standardized terminologies of a nursing diagnosis help nurses identify and treat patients' problems. Every electronic health record that uses nursing diagnosis must employ standard diagnostic terminology. Developing an efficient, individualized care plan begins with accurate nursing diagnoses.
There are thirteen domains...
There are thirteen domains...
3.9K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
3.9K
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
3.9K
Reliability and Validity
13.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.9K
Stereotype Content Model
15.4K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.4K
Data Validation
1.8K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
1.8K
Data Validation
6.7K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.7K

