Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Infectious Complications of Conventional Laparoscopic vs Robotic Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Systematic Literature
Alexandre R Marra1,2,3, Mireia Puig-Asensio1,2, Michael B Edmond1,2,4
11 Office of Clinical Quality, Safety and Performance Improvement, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Background:
Recent studies have shown that using minimally invasive surgical techniques (conventional laparoscopy or robotic) for prostatectomy is associated with lower perioperative complication rates compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy. However, differences in infectious complications between these minimally invasive approaches are not well characterized. To study this further, we performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of the infectious complications of prostatectomy, comparing robotic prostatectomy (RP) with conventional laparoscopic prostatectomy (LP).
Methods:
We searched PubMed, CINAHL, CDSR, and EMBASE through September 2018 for studies evaluating minimally invasive prostatectomy and infectious complications. We employed random-effect models to obtain pooled odds ratio (pOR) estimates. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 estimation and the Cochran Q statistic. pORs were calculated separately based on the indication for prostatectomy.
Results:
Fifteen studies were included in the final review for the meta-analysis with 14,121 patients undergoing minimally invasive prostatectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of infectious complication events between RP and LP (pOR 0.94; 95% CI 0.50, 1.76). When we performed a stratified analysis, similar results were found with no statistically significant difference in infectious complications comparing RP with LP among patients with prostate cancer (pOR 0.73; 95% CI 0.43, 1.24). We observed that infectious complications were nearly threefold higher with the robotic approach in earlier studies (published between 2007 and 2012, pOR 2.81; 95% CI 1.07, 7.39), but no significant difference was found in later studies (between 2013 and 2018, pOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.40, 1.57).
Conclusions:
The rate of infectious complications associated with RP was no different than that associated with conventional LP.
Insights
Robotic prostatectomy (RP) and laparoscopic prostatectomy (LP) have similar infectious complication rates. Earlier studies showed higher rates for RP, but this difference disappeared in later research, indicating comparable safety for both minimally invasive techniques.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Oncology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Minimally invasive prostatectomy (MIP) techniques, including conventional laparoscopy (LP) and robotic prostatectomy (RP), are associated with fewer perioperative complications than open surgery.
- However, the comparative rates of infectious complications between RP and LP remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze infectious complications following robotic prostatectomy versus conventional laparoscopic prostatectomy.
- To compare the incidence of infectious complications between RP and LP in patients undergoing prostatectomy.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, CDSR, and EMBASE up to September 2018.
- Random-effect models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (pOR) for infectious complications, with heterogeneity assessed using I² and Cochran Q statistics.
- Stratified analyses were performed based on the indication for prostatectomy and publication year.
Main Results:
- Fifteen studies comprising 14,121 patients were included in the meta-analysis.
- No statistically significant difference in infectious complications was found between RP and LP (pOR 0.94; 95% CI 0.50, 1.76).
- Infectious complication rates were similar between RP and LP for prostate cancer patients (pOR 0.73; 95% CI 0.43, 1.24). While earlier studies (2007-2012) showed higher rates for RP, later studies (2013-2018) found no significant difference.
Conclusions:
- Robotic prostatectomy and conventional laparoscopic prostatectomy are associated with comparable rates of infectious complications.
- The observed trend of higher infectious complications with RP in earlier studies has diminished in more recent research, suggesting equivalent safety profiles for these minimally invasive approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

