Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Comparative risks and benefits of drugs. Methodological problems].

M Biscos-Garreau1, M Girard

  • 1Groupe de Recherche en Pharmacovigilance, Neauphle-le-Château.

L'Encephale
|September 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

Focalizing toxicities, like antidepressant hematotoxicity, bias drug safety assessments. Validating safety data globally and comparatively is crucial for accurate risk-benefit analysis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complete nucleotide sequence of the genomic RNA of a French isolate of Pepino mosaic virus (PepMV). Brief report.

Archives of virology·2002
Same author

The influence of long emersion on biota, ammonium fluxes and nitrification in intertidal sediments of Marennes-Oléron Bay, France.

Marine environmental research·2002
Same author

Investing in CAD/CAM.

Journal of dental technology : the peer-reviewed publication of the National Association of Dental Laboratories·2002
Same author

Inositol hexakisphosphate-mediated regulation of glutamate receptors in rat brain sections.

Hippocampus·2002
Same author

Human Connexin 32, a gap junction protein altered in the X-linked form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, is directly regulated by the transcription factor SOX10.

Human molecular genetics·2001
Same author

DNA vaccine protection against challenge with simian/human immunodeficiency virus 89.6 in rhesus macaques.

Developments in biologicals·2001

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Drug Safety Evaluation
  • Clinical Toxicology

Background:

  • A focalizing toxicity disproportionately captures attention in drug safety evaluations.
  • Hematotoxicity associated with second-generation antidepressants serves as a prime example.
  • Biased perception and reporting of such toxicities impede objective risk-benefit assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define focalizing toxicity and its impact on drug safety perception.
  • To outline principles and methodologies for validating drug safety data.
  • To emphasize the necessity of a global and comparative approach to drug risk-benefit assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual framework development for defining focalizing toxicity.
  • Analysis of safety data handling and reporting biases.
  • Case examples using antidepressant-associated hematotoxicity to illustrate validation principles.

Main Results:

  • Focalizing toxicities can skew the perception of a drug's overall safety profile.
  • Standardized validation of safety data is essential to mitigate bias.
  • Antidepressant safety data highlights challenges in risk-benefit evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • Drug safety assessment requires a comprehensive and unbiased approach.
  • The concept of focalizing toxicity underscores the need for rigorous data validation.
  • Global and comparative analysis is paramount for accurate drug risk-benefit determination.

Related Experiment Videos