Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.0K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.0K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.9K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.9K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

10.7K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
10.7K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.7K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.6K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.6K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.4K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Terminology and core components of co-design intervention in chronic pain management: An international Delphi study.

The journal of pain·2026
Same author

The Prognosis of Disabling Musculoskeletal Pain and Predictors of Recovery in Children.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·2026
Same author

Musculoskeletal Pain Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Telesurvey.

Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada·2026
Same author

Recent highlights in low back pain research, Part II: Prevention and management.

Journal of physiotherapy·2026
Same author

Physical activity promotion in clinical practice: a cross-sectional survey of Brazilian physical therapists.

Journal of bodywork and movement therapies·2026
Same author

Behaving Differently! Why Don't we Consider Different Research Questions to Integrate Behavioural Sciences into Sports Injury Prevention Research? A Methodological Rationale.

Sports medicine - open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 30, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.5K

Understanding and interpreting confidence and credible intervals around effect estimates.

Luiz Hespanhol1, Caio Sain Vallio2, Lucíola Menezes Costa2

  • 1Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Department of Public and Occupational Health (DPOH), Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute (APH), VU University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Academic Medical Center/VU University Medical Center IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
|January 15, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Understanding confidence intervals is crucial for evidence-based practice. This masterclass clarifies frequentist and Bayesian approaches to estimating and interpreting these uncertainty measures for better clinical decision-making.

Keywords:
BiostatisticsConfidence intervalsEvidence-based practicePhysical therapy specialtyStatistical data analysis

More Related Videos

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

29.7K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Effects of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation
04:59

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Effects of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Published on: January 19, 2024

3.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 30, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.5K
Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

29.7K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Effects of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation
04:59

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Effects of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Published on: January 19, 2024

3.7K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics in Medicine
  • Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Confidence intervals are vital for evidence-based practice, quantifying uncertainty around effect estimates.
  • Accurate interpretation is essential for clinicians to apply research findings realistically in practice.
  • Misinterpretation, such as dichotomizing into significant/non-significant, hinders understanding of precision and implications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss confidence intervals around effect estimates.
  • To explain frequentist and Bayesian methods for confidence interval estimation.
  • To clarify the interpretation of uncertainty measures.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of frequentist 95% confidence intervals and their interpretation.
  • Explanation of Bayesian 95% credible intervals and their interpretation.
  • Focus on understanding uncertainty measures in statistical analysis.

Main Results:

  • Frequentist 95% CI: 95% confidence that the true estimate lies within the interval.
  • Bayesian 95% credible interval: 95% probability the true estimate lies within the interval.
  • Highlights the importance of considering interval width (precision) and practical implications.

Conclusions:

  • Encourages the use and reporting of confidence intervals in scientific literature.
  • Promotes clinician engagement with interval interpretation for real-world decision-making.
  • Advocates for training to improve understanding and application of frequentist and Bayesian uncertainty measures.