Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Biopsy for Endometrial Cancer at Early Stage with Laparoscopy
Published on: August 19, 2021
Advanced stage (IIIC/IV) endometrial cancer: Role of cytoreduction and determinants of survival
Savithri Rajkumar1, Rahul Nath1, Geoffrey Lane1
1Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Objective:
Primary aim of this study was to assess the impact of optimal cytoreduction in women who had surgical treatment of advanced stage (IIIC/IV) endometrial cancer. Secondary objective was to define demographic and surgico-pathologic variables that exerted a significant influence on survival outcomes.
Study Design:
Records of 45 patients with stage IIIC/IV Endometrial cancer who underwent surgery with cytoreductive intent between 2010 and 2016 were analysed. Data on disease distribution, surgical procedures, adjuvant therapy and survival times was collated. Survival curves were plotted by Kaplan Meier method and median survival estimates were compared using log rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent variables predictive of survival.
Results:
28 women (62.2%) had undergone primary surgery and 17 (37.8%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to delayed primary surgery. Optimal cytoreduction to = 1 cm visible disease was achieved in 29 women (64.4%). Among 29 women who had optimal debulking, 24 had no visible disease. Median overall survival for the entire study cohort was 24 months. Median progression free survival in the optimal cytoreduction group was 16 months as opposed to 11.5 months in women who had > 1 cm residual disease (p = 0.02). Median overall survival was 29 months in patients who had optimal cytoreduction and 17.5 months in women who had bulky residual disease (p=0.002). Only poor performance status (p = 0.035), presence of bowel disease (p = 0.05) and suboptimal cytoreduction (p = 0.006) retained significance as predictors of poor survival on multivariate analyses. Suboptimal cytoreduction surgery, compared to optimal cytoreduction, showed a 3.55-fold increased risk of death independent of performance status and anatomic region with disease (Hazard Ratio 3.55 (95% confidence interval 1.44-8.73) p = 0.006).
Conclusion:
Survival analyses demonstrate significantly better progression free survival and overall survival when optimal cytoreduction is achieved. A prospective, multicentre study is recommended to establish conclusive evidence.
More Related Videos
09:48An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells
Published on: September 12, 2019
03:55Computer-Aided Three-Dimensional Visualization in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Thyroid Cancer
Published on: June 9, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...