Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
Published on: August 4, 2023
Survey of peptide quantification methods and comparison of their reproducibility: A case study using oxytocin
Chensheng Li1, Sitaram Bhavaraju1, Marie-Pier Thibeault2
1United States Pharmacopeia Convention, 12601 Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852, United States.
Abstract:
USP's peptide reference standards content is typically determined using an HPLC assay against an external standard for which the purity was determined by a mass balance approach. To explore the use of other analytical methods, the USP Biologics Department conducted a multi-laboratory collaborative study. The study determined the inter-laboratory variability for peptide quantitation using the following methods: HPLC assay, quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) spectroscopy, or amino acid analysis (AAA). The three methods were compared with regard to their suitability for quantitation of the nonapeptide oxytocin. In this study, the HPLC assay method using the same peptide bulk material as the standard showed the lowest inter-lab variability. The coefficient of variation (%CV) was calculated without counting the uncertainty associated with the purity assignment of the standard with mass balance. The proton qNMR method is a direct measurement of the peptide against an internal standard, which is not difficult to perform under common laboratory conditions. Because of the simpler operation and shorter analytical time, qNMR as a primary method for peptide reference standard value assignment deserves further exploration.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Introduction to Surveying, Plane Surveying and Geodetic Surveys
Peptide Bonds
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Types of Surveys
Survey Safety

