Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
Published on: September 17, 2019
Automated identification for autism severity level: EEG analysis using empirical mode decomposition and second order
Hikmat Hadoush1, Maha Alafeef2, Enas Abdulhay3
1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences at Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan.
This study used electroencephalography (EEG) analysis to differentiate between mild and severe autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children. The findings show distinct EEG patterns correlating with ASD severity, offering a potential automated diagnostic tool.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Automated diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) using nonlinear EEG analysis has historically struggled to differentiate severity levels.
- Previous methods could only distinguish ASD from typical development, not varying degrees of autistic features.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify EEG differences between mild and severe ASD using Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Second-Order Difference Plot (SODP).
- To determine the accuracy of these EEG analysis models in distinguishing ASD severity.
Main Methods:
- Resting-state EEG data from 36 children (equally divided into mild and severe ASD groups) were analyzed.
- EMD was used to extract Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) features, SODP patterns, elliptical area, and Central Tendency Measure (CTM) values.
- An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was employed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the derived EEG measures.
Main Results:
- Children with severe ASD exhibited less IMF oscillation, more stochastic SODP plotting, lower CTM values, and larger ellipse areas compared to those with mild ASD.
- These EEG patterns suggest greater variability and impaired behavioral control in severe ASD.
- The ANN achieved 100% sensitivity, 94.7% specificity, and 97.2% overall accuracy in differentiating between mild and severe ASD groups.
Conclusions:
- Distinct IMF features, SODP patterns, elliptical area, and CTM values differentiate between mild and severe ASD in children.
- These EEG-derived measures show promise as a sensitive automated tool for classifying ASD severity levels.
Related Concept Videos
Synthesis and Decomposition Reactions
Arrhenius Plots
The Arrhenius equation can be used...
Residual Plots
When the residual values are plotted against the variable x, it is called a residual...
Microsoft Excel: Plotting Mean, SD, and SE
First, calculate the mean, SD, and SE of your data. The mean is obtained using the formula `=AVERAGE(range)`, while SD can be calculated with `=STDEV.P(range)` for a population or `=STDEV.S(range)` for a sample. SE is calculated as `=SD/SQRT(n)`, where `n` is the sample size.
To plot these values, use a bar...
What is a Mode?
There can be more than one mode in a data set if multiple values have the same highest frequency. For instance, suppose that the Statistics exam scores of 20 students are: 50; 53; 59; 59; 63; 63; 72; 72; 72; 72; 72; 76; 78; 81; 83; 84; 84; 84; 90; 93. Here, the mode is 72, as it occurs most frequently, five times.
A data set with two modes is called bimodal. For example,...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.

