Automated identification for autism severity level: EEG analysis using empirical mode decomposition and second order difference plot
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
Published on: September 17, 2019
Hikmat Hadoush1, Maha Alafeef2, Enas Abdulhay3
1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences at Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan.
Background:
Previous automated EEG-based diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) using various nonlinear EEG analysis methods were limited to distinguish only children with ASD from those normally developed without approaching their autistic features severity.
Objectives:
Identifying potential differences between children with mild and sever ASD based on EEG analysis using empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and second-order difference plot (SODP) models, and determining the accuracy of such model outcome measures to distinguish ASD severity levels.
Methods:
Resting-state EEG data recorded for 36 children, who divided equally into two matched groups of mild and sever ASD. EMD analysis was applied to their EEG data to identify intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) features, SODP patterns, elliptical area and central tendency measure (CTM) values. Artificial neural network then used to determine the accuracy of this models outcome measures in distinguishing between the two ASD groups.
Results:
Children with sever ASD showed smaller, less twitches and oscillation of IMFs features, more stochastic SODP plotting, less CTM values, and higher ellipse area values compared to the children with mild ASD, which indicates their greater EEG variabilities and their greater inability to suppress their improper behavior. ANN ended with model sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 94.7%, respectively, and 97.2% overall accuracy of distinguishing between ASD groups.
Conclusion:
Children with sever and mild ASD had different IMFs features, SODP plotting, elliptical area and CTM values. In addition, these EMD outcome measures could serve as a sensitive automated tool to distinguish different severity levels in children with ASD.
Related Concept Videos
Synthesis and Decomposition Reactions
Arrhenius Plots
The Arrhenius equation can be used...
Residual Plots
When the residual values are plotted against the variable x, it is called a residual...
Microsoft Excel: Plotting Mean, SD, and SE
First, calculate the mean, SD, and SE of your data. The mean is obtained using the formula `=AVERAGE(range)`, while SD can be calculated with `=STDEV.P(range)` for a population or `=STDEV.S(range)` for a sample. SE is calculated as `=SD/SQRT(n)`, where `n` is the sample size.
To plot these values, use a bar...
What is a Mode?
There can be more than one mode in a data set if multiple values have the same highest frequency. For instance, suppose that the Statistics exam scores of 20 students are: 50; 53; 59; 59; 63; 63; 72; 72; 72; 72; 72; 76; 78; 81; 83; 84; 84; 84; 90; 93. Here, the mode is 72, as it occurs most frequently, five times.
A data set with two modes is called bimodal. For example,...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.

