Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Characterization of Functionally Associated miRNAs in Glioblastoma and their Engineering into Artificial Clusters for Gene Therapy
Published on: October 4, 2019
Distinct Phenotypic Clusters of Glioblastoma Growth and Response Kinetics Predict Survival
Corbin A Rayfield1, Fillan Grady1, Gustavo De Leon1
1Corbin A. Rayfield, Fillan Grady, Gustavo De Leon, Eduardo Carrasco, Pamela Jackson, Mayur Vora, Sandra K. Johnston, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud, Kamala R. Clark-Swanson, Scott Whitmire, Mauricio E. Gamez, Alyx Porter, Leland Hu, Bernard Bendok, Sujay Vora, and Kristin R. Swanson, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Russell Rockne, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and Sandra K. Johnston and Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Purpose:
Despite the intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity seen in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), there is little definitive data on the underlying cause of the differences in patient survivals. Serial imaging assessment of tumor growth allows quantification of tumor growth kinetics (TGK) measured in terms of changes in the velocity of radial expansion seen on imaging. Because a systematic study of this entire TGK phenotype-growth before treatment and during each treatment to recurrence -has never been coordinately studied in GBMs, we sought to identify whether patients cluster into discrete groups on the basis of their TGK.
Patients And Methods:
From our multi-institutional database, we identified 48 patients who underwent maximally safe resection followed by radiotherapy with imaging follow-up through the time of recurrence. The patients were then clustered into two groups through a k-means algorithm taking as input only the TGK before and during treatment.
Results:
There was a significant survival difference between the clusters ( P = .003). Paradoxically, patients among the long-lived cluster had significantly larger tumors at diagnosis ( P = .027) and faster growth before treatment ( P = .003) but demonstrated a better response to adjuvant chemotherapy ( P = .048). A predictive model was built to identify which cluster patients would likely fall into on the basis of information that would be available to clinicians immediately after radiotherapy (accuracy, 90.3%).
Conclusion:
Dichotomizing the heterogeneity of GBMs into two populations-one faster growing yet more responsive with increased survival and one slower growing yet less responsive with shorter survival-suggests that many patients who receive standard-of-care treatments may get better benefit from select alternative treatments.
More Related Videos
11:53Predicting Gene Silencing Through the Spatiotemporal Control of siRNA Release from Photo-responsive Polymeric Nanocarriers
Published on: July 21, 2017
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Kinetic Energy
Enzyme Kinetics
Scientists typically study enzyme kinetics with a fixed amount of enzyme in the controlled environment of a test tube. When more reactant, or substrate, is...
Kinetic Molecular Theory: Molecular Velocities, Temperature, and Kinetic Energy
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...