Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Surgical Tissues
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: FISH as a Tool for Precise Gene Amplification Assessment in Cancer Specimens
Published on: July 12, 2024
Torsten Lippmann1, Peter Braubach1, Max Ettinger1
1Institute of Pathology (T.L., P.B., M.K., F.L., and D.J.) and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (M.E.), Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany.
Background:
As the number of arthroplasties performed increases, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a common and challenging problem. The Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) recommends diagnosing PJI according to its guidelines. The aim of the current study was to assess whether fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded periprosthetic membranes can successfully improve the diagnosis of infection in patients with orthopaedic implants.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 88 periprosthetic membranes of joint prostheses using FISH analysis according to a standard protocol, with a probe targeting a sequence found in most bacteria. We compared the results with routine clinical classification according to the guidelines of the MSIS, microbiological culture, and histopathological classification according to Morawietz and Krenn. We additionally performed FISH analysis using 2 species-specific probes for several culture-positive cases.
Results:
FISH successfully detected bacteria in 38 (95%) of 40 periprosthetic membranes that were rated positive by clinical classification. FISH results compared with clinical classification demonstrated a sensitivity of 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.08% to 99.39%), a specificity of 85.42% (95% CI, 72.24% to 93.93%), a positive predictive value of 84.44% (95% CI, 70.55% to 93.50%), and a negative predictive value of 95.35% (95% CI, 84.19% to 99.43%). FISH results compared with histopathological classification demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.12% (95% CI, 83.47% to 99.40%), a specificity of 87.23% (95% CI, 74.26% to 95.17%), a positive predictive value of 86.67% (95% CI, 73.21% to 94.95%), and a negative predictive value of 95.35% (95% CI, 84.19% to 99.43%). We successfully detected Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus with species-specific FISH probes in all cases that were positive for these respective bacteria by microbiological culture.
Conclusions:
FISH-based diagnosis of PJI is feasible and can be used as an additional diagnostic criterion. FISH not only can detect bacteria in periprosthetic membranes but can also differentiate pathogens at the species level. FISH represents a fast and reliable tool for detecting PJI in periprosthetic membranes, especially in combination with clinical and histopathological classification.
Level Of Evidence:
Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Insights
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of periprosthetic membranes is a reliable method for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This technique accurately detects bacteria and identifies specific pathogens, improving diagnostic accuracy for PJI.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant challenge following arthroplasty procedures.
- Accurate diagnosis of PJI is crucial for effective patient management.
- Current diagnostic guidelines, such as those from the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), are essential but can be supplemented.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in diagnosing PJI.
- To determine if FISH analysis of periprosthetic membranes improves diagnostic accuracy.
- To assess FISH's ability to identify specific bacterial pathogens in infected joint implants.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 88 periprosthetic membranes from joint prostheses.
- Application of FISH with a broad-range bacterial probe.
- Comparison of FISH results with MSIS clinical classification, microbiological culture, and histopathological analysis.
- Use of species-specific FISH probes for targeted pathogen identification.
Main Results:
- FISH demonstrated high accuracy in detecting bacteria in membranes classified as infected by clinical criteria (95% sensitivity).
- FISH achieved high sensitivity (95.12%) and specificity (87.23%) when compared to histopathological classification.
- Species-specific FISH probes successfully identified Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in culture-positive cases.
Conclusions:
- Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a feasible and valuable tool for diagnosing PJI.
- FISH analysis of periprosthetic membranes enhances diagnostic capabilities, offering both bacterial detection and species differentiation.
- Combining FISH with clinical and histopathological assessments provides a robust approach for PJI diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
FISH - Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization
In-situ Hybridization
Types of probes and labels
A probe is a complementary strand of DNA or RNA that binds to corresponding nucleotide sequences in a cell. Many...
Fixed Action Patterns
Osmoregulation in Fishes
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints
Hybrid Zones

