Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Innovative Strategies for Organ Preservation in Heart Transplantation: Uniform Cooling Preservation and Ex-situ Normothermic Perfusion
Published on: November 28, 2025
Simultaneous Versus Sequential Heart-liver Transplantation: Ideal Strategies for Organ Allocation
A Justin Rucker1, Kevin L Anderson1, Michael S Mulvihill1
1Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Insights
Simultaneous heart-liver transplantation offers comparable survival to sequential heart-then-liver transplantation. However, simultaneous transplantation maximizes benefit for patients needing both organs due to higher rates of proceeding to the second transplant.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation medicine
- Cardiology
- Hepatology
Background:
- Combined heart and liver failure necessitates complex treatment strategies.
- Simultaneous heart-liver (SHL) transplantation is an established therapy.
- The comparative efficacy of sequential heart-then-liver transplantation (LAH) versus SHL remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the survival outcomes of simultaneous heart-liver (SHL) transplantation with sequential heart-then-liver (LAH) transplantation.
- To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of LAH in patients with combined heart and liver failure.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file.
- Linking thoracic and liver databases for adult recipients waitlisted for both heart and liver transplants.
- Univariate survival analysis to compare outcomes between SHL, LAH, and isolated heart transplant (iOHT) groups.
Main Results:
- Ten-year survival favored both LAH and SHL over iOHT (P = .003).
- SHL recipients experienced significantly less acute rejection within one year compared to LAH and iOHT recipients (P = .007).
- A substantial proportion of patients undergoing initial heart transplant alone did not proceed to subsequent liver transplantation.
Conclusions:
- Both simultaneous heart-liver (SHL) and sequential heart-then-liver (LAH) transplantation provide equivalent survival outcomes.
- Simultaneous transplantation is associated with maximum benefit for patients requiring both organ transplants.
- Strategies to improve the rate of subsequent liver transplantation in the LAH pathway are warranted.
Background:
Simultaneous heart-liver (SHL) transplantation is an efficacious therapeutic modality for patients with combined heart and liver failure. However, the extent to which heart transplantation followed by sequential liver transplantation (LAH) can match the benefit of simultaneous transplantation has not previously been examined. Our objective was to determine if LAH offers comparable survival to SHL.
Methods:
The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file was queried for adult recipients waitlisted for both heart and liver transplantation. The United Network for Organ Sharing thoracic and liver databases were linked to facilitate examination of waitlist and transplant characteristics for simultaneously listed patients. Univariate survival analysis was used to determine overall survival.
Results:
Of the 236 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 200 underwent SHL, 7 sequentially underwent LAH, and 29 received heart transplantation only (isolated orthotopic heart transplantation [iOHT]). Recipients of SHL were less likely to have an episode of acute rejection before discharge (LAH, 14.2%; SHL, 2.4%; iOHT, 3.6%; P = .019) or be treated for acute rejection within 1 year after transplantation (LAH, 14.3%; SHL, 2.5%; iOHT, 13.8%; P = .007). Otherwise, postoperative hospital length of stay, stroke, need for dialysis, and need for pacemaker placement were comparable across groups. Ten-year survival similarly favored both LAH and SHL over iOHT (LAH: 100%, 71.4%, 53.6%; SHL: 87.1%, 80.4%, 52.1%, iOHT: 70.1%, 51.6%, 27.5% for 1-, 5-, and 10-year survivals, respectively, P = .003). However, median time between heart and liver transplant was 302 days in patients undergoing sequential transplantation.
Conclusions:
Although transplantation in a simultaneous or sequential fashion yields equivalent outcomes, a high fraction of patients undergoing initial heart transplant alone fail to proceed to subsequent liver transplantation. Therefore, in patients with combined heart and liver failure with a projected need for 2 allografts, simultaneous transplantation is associated with maximum benefit.
Related Concept Videos
Ideal Solutions
The Ideal Transformer
Ampere's Law forms the basis of understanding the magnetic field within the transformer. It states that the integral of the magnetic field intensity's tangential...
The Ideal Diode
Accessory Organs
Anatomy of the Heart
Levels of Organization
Molecules Are Composed of Atoms, and Biomolecules Are Assembled from Molecules:
The most basic levels include atoms, molecules, and biomolecules. Atoms, the smallest unit of ordinary matter, are composed of a nucleus and electrons. Molecules...

