Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position
Published on: August 17, 2017
A 1-year perspective on goal-directed therapy in elderly with hip fracture: Secondary outcomes
Erzsebet Bartha1,2, Thomas Davidson3, Hans E Berg2,4
1Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Insights
Goal-directed therapy (GDT) and routine fluid treatment (RFT) showed no significant differences in survival or complications for elderly hip fracture patients. Further large-scale research is needed to clarify effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Geriatric Medicine
- Anesthesiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) on elderly hip fracture patients comparing goal-directed therapy (GDT) with routine fluid treatment (RFT) yielded inconclusive results.
- This study aimed to evaluate secondary outcomes and cost-effectiveness at 4 months and 1 year post-intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare long-term survival, complication rates, hospital readmissions, and quality of life (EQ-5D) between GDT and RFT in elderly hip fracture patients.
- To analyze the cost-effectiveness of GDT versus RFT using a combined approach of clinical effectiveness, quality of life, and costs.
Main Methods:
- Elderly patients (age ≥70) with hip fracture were randomized to either GDT or RFT.
- Secondary outcomes included survival, complications, readmissions, and EQ-5D changes at 4 months and 1 year.
- Cost-effectiveness was assessed using a dedicated analytical tool.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were observed between GDT and RFT regarding survival (RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.45-1.28) or complications (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.4-1.10) at 12 months.
- Analysis of intention-to-treat data (GDT n=74; RFT n=75) revealed no significant differences in hospital readmissions or quality of life changes.
Conclusions:
- The statistical uncertainty and data variability highlight the need for larger sample sizes in future research.
- Incorporating patient-oriented outcomes in subsequent trials is recommended for robust health economic evaluations and decision support regarding GDT implementation.
Background:
We have previously reported inconclusive results from a randomized controlled trial in elderly with hip-fracture comparing intra-operative goal-directed therapy with routine fluid treatment. Now we aimed to describe and compare secondary outcomes at 4 months and 1 year follow-up and to analyze the cost-effectiveness.
Methods:
Patients with hip fracture (age ≥70) were randomized for GDT or routine fluid treatment (RFT). The secondary outcomes were long-term survival, complications, number of hospital readmissions, and quality of life (EQ-5D) changes. Additionally, cost effectiveness was analyzed by an analytic tool which combines the clinical effectiveness, quality of life changes and costs.
Results:
Patient data (GDT n = 74; RFT n = 75) were analyzed on an intention to treat basis. Statistically significant differences (GDT vs RFT) were not found considering survival (RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.45-1.28) and complications (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.4-1.10) at 12 months. No statistically significant difference was found between hospital readmissions and quality of life changes.
Conclusion:
The statistical uncertainty of risk reduction of negative outcomes and the large variability of the collected data indicate the need of further research in large sample sizes. To enable future health economic evaluation for decision support surrounding implementation of GDT, we suggest adding patient-oriented outcomes in future trials.
Related Concept Videos
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Secondary Active Transport
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Secondary Healthcare System
Primary and Secondary Growth in Roots and Shoots

