Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

The NeuroStar TMS Device: Conducting the FDA Approved Protocol for Treatment of Depression
Published on: November 12, 2010
Treatment recommendations to cancer patients in the context of FDA guidance for next generation sequencing
Grace K Dy1, Mary K Nesline2, Antonios Papanicolau-Sengos2
1Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.
Background:
Regulatory approval of next generation sequencing (NGS) by the FDA is advancing the use of genomic-based precision medicine for the therapeutic management of cancer as standard care. Recent FDA guidance for the classification of genomic variants based on clinical evidence to aid clinicians in understanding the actionability of identified variants provided by comprehensive NGS panels has also been set forth. In this retrospective analysis, we interpreted and applied the FDA variant classification guidance to comprehensive NGS testing performed for advanced cancer patients and assessed oncologist agreement with NGS test treatment recommendations.
Methods:
NGS comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in a CLIA certified lab (657 completed tests for 646 patients treated at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center) between June 2016 and June 2017. Physician treatment recommendations made within 120 days post-test were gathered from tested patients' medical records and classified as targeted therapy, precision medicine clinical trial, immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy/radiation, surgery, transplant, or non-therapeutic (hospice, surveillance, or palliative care). Agreement between NGS test report targeted therapy recommendations based on the FDA variant classification and physician targeted therapy treatment recommendations were evaluated.
Results:
Excluding variants contraindicating targeted therapy (i.e., KRAS or NRAS mutations), at least one variant with FDA level 1 companion diagnostic supporting evidence as the most actionable was identified in 14% of tests, with physicians most frequently recommending targeted therapy (48%) for patients with these results. This stands in contrast to physicians recommending targeted therapy based on test results with FDA level 2 (practice guideline) or FDA level 3 (clinical trial or off label) evidence as the most actionable result (11 and 4%, respectively).
Conclusions:
We found an appropriate "dose-response" relationship between the strength of clinical evidence supporting biomarker-directed targeted therapy based on application of FDA guidance for NGS test variant classification, and subsequent treatment recommendations made by treating physicians. In view of recent changes at FDA, it is paramount to define regulatory grounds and medical policy coverage for NGS testing based on this guidance.
Insights
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) test results align with physician treatment decisions for cancer patients. Stronger evidence for genomic variants leads to more targeted therapy recommendations, supporting precision medicine.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Clinical Pathology
Background:
- Regulatory approval of next-generation sequencing (NGS) advances genomic-based precision medicine in cancer care.
- FDA guidance classifies genomic variants by clinical evidence, aiding treatment decisions.
- Comprehensive NGS panels provide actionable variant information for oncologists.
Purpose of the Study:
- To interpret and apply FDA variant classification guidance to NGS tests for advanced cancer patients.
- To assess oncologist agreement with NGS test treatment recommendations.
- To evaluate the relationship between FDA variant classification levels and physician treatment choices.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 657 comprehensive NGS tests from 646 advanced cancer patients.
- Gathering and classifying physician treatment recommendations made within 120 days post-NGS testing.
- Evaluating agreement between NGS report recommendations and physician-prescribed targeted therapies based on FDA variant classification.
Main Results:
- 14% of tests identified at least one variant with FDA Level 1 evidence, leading to targeted therapy in 48% of cases.
- Physicians recommended targeted therapy less frequently for variants with FDA Level 2 (11%) or Level 3 (4%) evidence.
- A dose-response relationship was observed between evidence strength and targeted therapy recommendations.
Conclusions:
- Physician treatment recommendations correlate with the strength of clinical evidence supporting targeted therapies, as per FDA guidance.
- Defining regulatory and medical policy coverage for NGS testing is crucial, especially with recent FDA changes.
- This study supports the utility of FDA-guided variant classification in informing precision cancer treatment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Self Within Cultural Contexts
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Vygotsky's Cognitive Development in Cultural Context

