Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Characterizing Exon Skipping Efficiency in DMD Patient Samples in Clinical Trials of Antisense Oligonucleotides
Published on: May 7, 2020
Endpoints and patient stratification in clinical trials for alcoholic hepatitis
Philippe Mathurin1, Mark Thursz2
1Service des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, PU-PH, Hôpital Claude Huriez, 1er étage- Aile Est, Rue Michel Polonovski, 59037 Lille Cedex, France.
Abstract:
In some areas of medicine the clinical development pathway through phase II and III clinical trials has been well mapped out and refined through extensive experience. In contrast, a number of key questions remain unanswered in the development of novel therapeutics for alcoholic hepatitis. The use of mortality as an endpoint in phase II clinical trials will potentially restrict the appeal of this therapeutic area for pharmaceutical companies, as the number of patients required for adequately powered clinical trials becomes impractical. Herein, we discuss alternative endpoints and conclude that dynamic assessment of liver function is the most pragmatic option in early stage studies. Stratification based on disease severity should be applied to avoid uneven distribution of patients with substantially differing mortality risks. Consensus on early phase trial design would help to facilitate new therapeutic development in this area of high unmet medical need.
Insights
Developing new treatments for alcoholic hepatitis faces challenges. Using liver function tests as endpoints in early trials is more practical than mortality, aiding drug development for this unmet need.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Clinical Trial Design
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Clinical development pathways are established in many medical fields.
- Novel therapeutics for alcoholic hepatitis development faces significant unanswered questions.
- Current trial designs may hinder pharmaceutical investment in this area.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss alternative endpoints for alcoholic hepatitis clinical trials.
- To propose pragmatic solutions for early-phase study designs.
- To facilitate the development of new therapeutics for alcoholic hepatitis.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and expert discussion on clinical trial endpoints.
- Analysis of the practicality of mortality versus functional endpoints in Phase II trials.
- Recommendations for trial stratification based on disease severity.
Main Results:
- Mortality as an endpoint in Phase II trials is impractical due to patient numbers.
- Dynamic assessment of liver function is a pragmatic alternative endpoint for early studies.
- Stratification by disease severity is crucial for balanced patient distribution.
Conclusions:
- Alternative endpoints, specifically dynamic liver function assessment, are recommended for early-phase alcoholic hepatitis trials.
- Stratification by disease severity is essential for robust trial outcomes.
- Consensus on early-phase trial design is needed to advance therapeutic development for alcoholic hepatitis.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Precipitation Titration: Endpoint Detection Methods
In the Volhard method, a standard excess of AgNO3 is first added to the...
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Oxidation of Alcohols
The process of oxidation in a chemical reaction is observed in any of the three forms:

