Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
Risk of Stroke among Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Phuuwadith Wattanachayakul1, Pongprueth Rujirachun1, Patompong Ungprasert2
1Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Insights
Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have a significantly higher risk of stroke. Further research is needed to confirm causality and guide clinical practice for this association.
Area of Science:
- Medical research
- Epidemiology
- Clinical practice
Background:
- Emerging evidence suggests a potential link between chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and increased stroke risk.
- Existing data are limited, necessitating a comprehensive analysis to clarify this association.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze existing studies on the relationship between CRS and stroke.
- To quantify the risk of stroke in patients diagnosed with CRS.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to October 2018.
- Included observational studies compared stroke risk in CRS patients versus controls.
- Random-effects meta-analysis calculated pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Main Results:
- Five studies encompassing 447,065 participants were included in the meta-analysis.
- Patients with CRS exhibited a significantly elevated risk of stroke.
- The pooled RR for stroke in CRS patients was 1.79 (95% CI: 1.34-2.40), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=84%).
Conclusions:
- Chronic rhinosinusitis is associated with an increased risk of stroke.
- The causal nature of this association requires further investigation.
- Clinical implications for managing CRS patients at risk of stroke warrant additional study.
Background:
Recent studies have suggested that patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) may have a higher risk of stroke although the data are still limited. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aims to identify all studies that investigated this relationship and summarize their results together to better characterize the risk of stroke among patients with CRS.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature review was conducted by searching for published articles in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to October 2018 to identify all observational studies that compared the risk of stroke among patients with CRS to individuals without CRS. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.
Results:
A total of 5 studies with 447,065 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included into the meta-analysis. The risk of stroke among patients with CRS was significantly higher than individuals without CRS with the pooled RR of 1.79 (95% CI, 1.34-2.40, I2 = 84%).
Conclusions:
The current study found that CRS is associated with higher risk stroke. Whether this relationship is causal and how it should be addressed in clinical practice require further investigations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Relative Risk
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...

