Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Exosomal miRNA Analysis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC Patients' Plasma Through qPCR: A Feasible Liquid Biopsy Tool
Published on: May 27, 2016
Molecular Analysis of Plasma From Patients With ROS1-Positive NSCLC
Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack1, Marguerite Rooney1, Rebecca J Nagy2
1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Introduction:
Circulating tumor DNA analysis is an emerging genotyping strategy that can identify tumor-specific genetic alterations in plasma including mutations and rearrangements. Detection of ROS1 fusions in plasma requires genotyping approaches that cover multiple breakpoints and target a variety of fusion partners. Compared to other molecular subsets of NSCLC, experience with detecting ROS1 genetic alterations in plasma is limited.
Methods:
To describe the spectrum of ROS1 fusions in NSCLC and determine sensitivity for detecting ROS1 fusions in plasma, we queried the Guardant Health plasma dataset and an institutional tissue database and compared plasma findings to tissue results. In addition, we used the Guardant360 NGS assay to detect potential genetic mediators of resistance in plasma from patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC who were relapsing on crizotinib.
Results:
We detected seven distinct fusion partners in plasma, most of which (n = 6 of 7) were also represented in the tissue dataset. Fusions pairing CD74 with ROS1 predominated in both cohorts (plasma: n = 35 of 56, 63%; tissue: n = 26 of 52, 50%). There was 100% concordance between the specific tissue- and plasma-detected ROS1 fusion for seven patients genotyped with both methods. Sensitivity for detecting ROS1 fusions in plasma at relapse on ROS1-directed therapy was 50%. Six (33%) of 18 post-crizotinib plasma specimens harbored ROS1 kinase domain mutations, five of which were ROS1 G2032R. Two (11%) post-crizotinib plasma specimens had genetic alterations (n = 1 each BRAF V600E and PIK3CA E545K) potentially associated with ROS1-independent signaling.
Conclusions:
Plasma genotyping captures the spectrum of ROS1 fusions observed in tissue. Plasma genotyping is a promising approach to detecting mutations that drive resistance to ROS1-directed therapies.
Insights
Plasma genotyping effectively detects ROS1 fusions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), matching tissue results. This approach shows promise for identifying resistance mutations during targeted therapy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Genetics
Background:
- Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is an emerging genotyping strategy for detecting tumor-specific genetic alterations in plasma.
- Experience with detecting ROS1 genetic alterations in plasma, particularly fusions, is limited compared to other non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) molecular subsets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the spectrum of ROS1 fusions in NSCLC.
- To determine the sensitivity of plasma genotyping for detecting ROS1 fusions.
- To identify potential genetic mediators of resistance in patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC relapsing on crizotinib.
Main Methods:
- Queried Guardant Health plasma dataset and an institutional tissue database.
- Compared plasma findings to tissue results for ROS1 fusions.
- Utilized Guardant360 NGS assay to detect resistance mutations in plasma post-crizotinib therapy.
Main Results:
- Seven distinct ROS1 fusion partners were detected in plasma, with CD74-ROS1 fusions predominating (63% in plasma, 50% in tissue).
- 100% concordance was observed between plasma and tissue-detected ROS1 fusions in seven patients.
- Plasma genotyping sensitivity for ROS1 fusions at relapse was 50%.
- Post-crizotinib plasma specimens showed ROS1 kinase domain mutations (33%) and potential ROS1-independent alterations (11%).
Conclusions:
- Plasma genotyping accurately captures the spectrum of ROS1 fusions found in tissue.
- Plasma genotyping is a promising method for detecting resistance mutations to ROS1-directed therapies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Position-effect Variegation
Molecular Models
Molecular Orbital Theory I
Serial Position Effect
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Molecular Orbital Theory II

