Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Electroporation of Craniofacial Mesenchyme
Published on: November 28, 2011
Effect of the Visual Presentation of a Craniofacial Syndrome on Speech Intelligibility in Noise
Tim Bressmann1, Tamara Eick1, Jennifer Pardo2
11 Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Objective:
Research has argued that a speaker's facial appearance can result in an "intelligibility cost" for the listener. The study investigated whether such an intelligibility cost exists for a visible repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry.
Setting:
University department.
Participants:
Eight typical speakers provided speech samples. Twenty-eight naive listeners participated in a speech in noise experiment.
Interventions:
Listeners transcribed sentences in noise that were paired with faces of individuals with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry or typical faces. They also rated speaker intelligibility and answered a questionnaire about their previous knowledge about cleft lip and palate.
Main Outcome Measures:
Percentage of words transcribed correctly and intelligibility ratings, compared by experimental condition (photo of typical face or face with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry) and speaker gender.
Results:
There were no statistically significant differences between speech stimuli that were presented with faces with repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry or typical faces. The percentage of words transcribed correctly by the listeners was lower for female speakers (F = 12.7, df = 1; P < .01). Speech intelligibility of female speakers was rated more poorly (F = 10.5, df = 1; P < .01).
Conclusions:
Presence of a repaired cleft lip and nasal asymmetry did not result in an intelligibility cost for naive listeners. Future research should investigate possible effects of facial motion or previous knowledge.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Presentation
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Processes of Self-Presentation
Intelligence
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification

