Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

A Mice Model of Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Induced Peritoneal Damage
Published on: April 28, 2022
Efficacy of Tedizolid against Enterococci and Staphylococci, Including cfr+ Strains, in a Mouse Peritonitis Model
Kavindra V Singh1,2, Cesar A Arias3,4,5,2,6, Barbara E Murray3,4,2
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA kavindra.singh@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract:
In a mouse peritonitis model, tedizolid was comparable to linezolid and daptomycin against an Enterococcus faecium strain (VANr, AMPr), an Enterococcus faecalis strain, and a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain with and without cfr Against a cfr(B)+E. faecium, tedizolid was inferior in vivo to linezolid and daptomycin, despite an ∼4-fold lower MIC.
Insights
Tedizolid showed effectiveness comparable to linezolid and daptomycin against common resistant bacteria. However, tedizolid was less effective in vivo against specific cfr(B)-positive Enterococcus faecium strains.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Emergence of antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to public health.
- Oxazolidinones, including tedizolid and linezolid, are crucial for treating infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens.
- Enterococcus faecium and Staphylococcus aureus are common causes of difficult-to-treat infections, often exhibiting resistance to multiple drugs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of tedizolid compared to linezolid and daptomycin.
- To assess the activity of tedizolid against specific Gram-positive bacterial strains, including those with cfr-mediated resistance.
- To investigate the comparative performance in a murine peritonitis model.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a mouse peritonitis model to simulate systemic bacterial infection.
- Tested tedizolid, linezolid, and daptomycin against Enterococcus faecium (including vancomycin and ampicillin-resistant strains), Enterococcus faecalis, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
- Included MRSA strains with and without the cfr gene, and Enterococcus faecium strains with cfr(B).
Main Results:
- Tedizolid demonstrated comparable efficacy to linezolid and daptomycin against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, and MRSA strains (with and without cfr).
- In vivo, tedizolid was found to be inferior to both linezolid and daptomycin when tested against a cfr(B)-positive Enterococcus faecium strain.
- This reduced efficacy occurred despite tedizolid exhibiting a lower minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in vitro against this specific strain.
Conclusions:
- Tedizolid exhibits broad in vivo activity against various resistant Gram-positive bacteria in a peritonitis model.
- The presence of cfr(B) in Enterococcus faecium significantly impacts tedizolid's in vivo effectiveness, rendering it inferior to linezolid and daptomycin.
- These findings highlight the importance of considering specific resistance mechanisms when selecting antibiotics for challenging Gram-positive infections.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Efficacy
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Thermal Strain
Shearing Strain
Measurements of Strain
Peritoneal Dialysis I: Introduction and Procedure

