Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Aliasing01:18

Aliasing

620
Accurate signal sampling and reconstruction are crucial in various signal-processing applications. A time-domain signal's spectrum can be revealed using its Fourier transform. When this signal is sampled at a specific frequency, it results in multiple scaled replicas of the original spectrum in the frequency domain. The spacing of these replicas is determined by the sampling frequency.
If the sampling frequency is below the Nyquist rate, these replicas overlap, preventing the original...
620
IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region01:03

IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region

1.9K
IR spectra are divided into two main regions: the diagnostic region and the fingerprint region. The diagnostic region of the spectrum lies above 1500 cm−1. The absorptions resulting from single-bond vibrations of the N–H, C–H, and O–H stretch at higher wavenumbers and appear on the left side of the spectrum. The stretching absorptions of the C≡C and C≡N occur between 2100–2300 cm−1. In contrast, those arising from stretching absorptions of the...
1.9K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same author

OpenMRF: A Modular, Vendor-Neutral Open-Source Framework for Reproducible Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting using Pulseq.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the bladder is feasible in men with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2026
Same author

The Future of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Navigating Ultra-High and Low-Field Imaging (Part 1).

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same author

The Future of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Navigating Ultra-High and Low-Field Imaging (Part 2).

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Characterization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Peripheral Zone Using Rapid B<sub>1</sub>-Insensitive MR Fingerprinting.

Radiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
10:23

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy

Published on: June 23, 2023

2.7K

Parameter map error due to normal noise and aliasing artifacts in MR fingerprinting.

Danielle Kara1, Mingdong Fan1, Jesse Hamilton2

  • 1Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|January 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary

A new quality factor tool rapidly forecasts T1 and T2 errors in MR fingerprinting (MRF) sequences. This enables efficient MRF sequence design for improved accuracy and precision with fewer repetitions.

Keywords:
magnetic resonance fingerprintingoptimizationpulse sequence design

More Related Videos

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis
07:29

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis

Published on: November 11, 2022

2.5K
Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes
08:35

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes

Published on: July 17, 2021

23.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
10:23

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy

Published on: June 23, 2023

2.7K
HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis
07:29

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis

Published on: November 11, 2022

2.5K
Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes
08:35

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes

Published on: July 17, 2021

23.0K

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Quantitative MRI
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) enables simultaneous T1 and T2 quantification.
  • MRF sequence design is critical for accuracy and precision.
  • Noise and aliasing artifacts impact MRF parameter map quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce a quantitative tool for rapid forecasting of T1 and T2 parameter map errors in MRF.
  • Develop a method for MRF sequence optimization based on error forecasting.
  • Assess MRF sequence efficiency considering normal and aliasing noise.

Main Methods:

  • Derived quality factors relating signal variances to T1/T2 map variances.
  • Validated analytical results against Monte-Carlo simulations and phantom experiments at 3T.
  • Utilized quality factors to identify efficient MRF sequences for reduced repetitions.

Main Results:

  • Experimental results confirmed the ability of quality factors to assess MRF sequence efficiency under noise.
  • Quality factor assessment aligned with Monte-Carlo approach results.
  • Phantom experiments showed T1/T2 map error analysis consistent with quality factors (R² ≥ 0.92 for T1, R² ≥ 0.80 for T2).
  • Optimized sequences achieved comparable or improved accuracy/precision versus longer sequences.

Conclusions:

  • The quality factor framework enables rapid analysis and optimization of MRF sequence design.
  • T1 and T2 error forecasting is achieved through this quantitative tool.
  • Demonstrated utility in designing efficient MRF sequences for clinical applications.