Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Advanced Self-Healing Asphalt Reinforced by Graphene Structures: An Atomistic Insight
Published on: May 31, 2022
Concurrent coupling of atomistic simulation and mesoscopic hydrodynamics for flows over soft multi-functional
Yuying Wang1, Zhen Li, Junbo Xu
1CAS Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. chaoyang@ipe.ac.cn.
Abstract:
We develop an efficient parallel multiscale method that bridges the atomistic and mesoscale regimes, from nanometers to microns and beyond, via concurrent coupling of atomistic simulation and mesoscopic dynamics. In particular, we combine an all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) description for specific atomistic details in the vicinity of the functional surface with a dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) approach that captures mesoscopic hydrodynamics in the domain away from the functional surface. In order to achieve a seamless transition in dynamic properties we endow the MD simulation with a DPD thermostat, which is validated against experimental results by modeling water at different temperatures. We then validate the MD-DPD coupling method for transient Couette and Poiseuille flows, demonstrating that the concurrent MD-DPD coupling can resolve accurately the continuum-based analytical solutions. Subsequently, we simulate shear flows over grafted polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) surfaces (polymer brushes) for various grafting densities, and investigate the slip flow as a function of the shear stress. We verify that a "universal" power law exists for the slip length, in agreement with published results. Having validated the MD-DPD coupling method, we simulate time-dependent flows past an endothelial glycocalyx layer (EGL) in a microchannel. Coupled simulation results elucidate the dynamics of the EGL changing from an equilibrium state to a compressed state under shear by aligning the molecular structures along the shear direction. MD-DPD simulation results agree well with results of a single MD simulation, but with the former more than two orders of magnitude faster than the latter for system sizes above one micron.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
G-protein Coupled Receptors
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Cell-surface Signaling
Couple
A typical example to understand this concept is tightening a bolt with a lug wrench. A...

