Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Preparation of Adult Drosophila Eyes for Thin Sectioning and Microscopic Analysis
Published on: August 27, 2011
Cancer screening rates among transgender adults: Cross-sectional analysis of primary care data
Tara Kiran1, Sam Davie2, Dhanveer Singh3
1Staff physician and clinician investigator in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at St Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto in Ontario, Fidani Chair in Improvement and Innovation and Vice-Chair of Quality and Innovation in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto, and Associate Scientist in the Centre for Urban Health Solutions. tara.kiran@utoronto.ca.
Objective:
To compare rates of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening between patients who are transgender and those who are cisgender (ie, nontransgender).
Design:
Cross-sectional study.
Setting:
A multisite academic family health team in Toronto, Ont, serving more than 45 000 enrolled patients.
Participants:
All patients enrolled in the family health team who were eligible for cervical, breast, or colorectal cancer screening. Patients were identified as transgender using an automated search of the practice electronic medical record followed by manual audit.
Main Outcome Measures:
Screening rates for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer calculated using data from the electronic medical record and provincial cancer screening registry. Screening rates among the transgender and cisgender populations were compared using 2 tests, and logistic regression modeling was used to understand differences in screening after adjustment for age, neighbourhood income quintile, and number of primary care visits.
Results:
A total of 120 transgender patients were identified as eligible for cancer screening. More than 85% of transgender patients eligible for breast cancer screening were assigned male at birth. Transgender patients were less likely than cisgender patients (n = 20 514) were to be screened for cervical (56% vs 72%, P = .001; adjusted odds ratio [OR] of 0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.62), breast (33% vs 65%, P < .001; adjusted OR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.59), and colorectal cancer (55% vs 70%, P = .046; adjusted OR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.99).
Conclusion:
In this setting, transgender patients were less likely to receive recommended cancer screening compared with the cisgender population. Future research and quality improvement activities should aim to understand and address potential patient, provider, and system factors.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...
Crossing Over
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

