Applicability of the PRECISE-DAPT score in elderly patients with myocardial infarction

Carme Guerrero1, Albert Ariza-Solé1, Francesc Formiga2

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona.

Insights

The PRECISE-DAPT score may not accurately predict bleeding risk in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Alternative cut-off points may be needed for better risk stratification in this population.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Geriatrics
  • Clinical Risk Stratification

Background:

  • Elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) face elevated risks of both ischemic and bleeding complications.
  • Current guidelines suggest the PRECISE-DAPT score for bleeding risk assessment in ACS, but its effectiveness in elderly populations remains unevaluated.
  • This study investigates the PRECISE-DAPT score's performance in non-selected elderly ACS patients within routine clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the applicability and performance of the PRECISE-DAPT score in predicting bleeding risk among elderly patients (≥ 75 years) diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Main Methods:

  • The study utilized data from the IFFANIAM registry, including prospectively enrolled patients aged 75 years or older with STEMI.
  • Relevant bleeding events post-discharge were the primary outcome, defined by criteria such as hospital readmission, transfusion needs, interventions, cessation of antithrombotics, or death.
  • Bleeding risk was assessed using the PRECISE-DAPT score, categorized by the recommended cut-off (≥ 25) and by quartiles derived from the study cohort.

Main Results:

  • The study included 208 elderly patients with a mean age of 81.9 years.
  • A significant majority (92.6%) presented with PRECISE-DAPT scores exceeding the recommended threshold of 25.
  • While no significant difference in bleeding incidence was found based on the ≥ 25 cut-off, a progressive increase in bleeding events was observed across increasing PRECISE-DAPT quartiles (P = 0.038).

Conclusions:

  • The PRECISE-DAPT score's recommended cut-off of ≥ 25 is surpassed by most elderly ACS patients, limiting its discriminatory power.
  • The study suggests that utilizing alternative or customized cut-off points for the PRECISE-DAPT score may offer a more rational approach to predicting bleeding risk in this complex demographic.
  • Further research is warranted to refine bleeding risk stratification tools for elderly patients with ACS.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.2K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
101.0K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
11.0K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
15.3K