Effects of deliberate reflection on students' engagement in learning and learning outcomes
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2026

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
Published on: July 1, 2015
Ligia Maria Cayres Ribeiro1, Silvia Mamede2, Eliza Maria de Brito1
1Department of Medical Education Development, José do Rosário Vellano University (UNIFENAS) Medical School, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Context:
Reflection in practice is assumed to enhance interest in knowing more about a topic, increasing engagement in learning and learning outcomes. However, this claim lacks empirical evidence, particularly in medical education. The authors investigated the effects of deliberate reflection upon clinical cases on medical students' engagement in a learning activity and learning outcomes.
Methods:
A three-task (diagnostic task; learning activity; test) experiment was conducted in August 2017. Seventy-two fourth-year students from UNIFENAS-BH Medical School, Brazil, diagnosed two clinical cases with jaundice as the chief complaint, either by following a deliberate reflection procedure or making differential diagnosis. Subsequently, all participants received the same study material on the diagnosis of jaundice. Finally, they took a recall test on the study material. Outcome measurements were study time and test scores.
Results:
There was a significant effect of experimental condition on students' engagement in the learning activity and on learning outcomes. Students who deliberately reflected upon the cases invested more time in studying the material than those who made a differential diagnosis (respectively, mean = 254.97, standard deviation = 115.45 versus mean = 194.96, standard deviation = 111.68; p = 0.02; d = 0.53). Deliberate reflection was also related to higher scores in the test relative to differential diagnosis (respectively, mean = 22.08, standard deviation = 14.94 versus mean = 15.75, standard deviation = 9.24; p = 0.03; d = 0.51). Medium effect sizes (Cohen's d) were observed in both measurements.
Conclusions:
Relative to making differential diagnosis, deliberate reflection while diagnosing cases fostered medical students' engagement in learning and increased learning outcomes. Teachers can employ this relatively easy procedure, possibly both with simulated and real scenarios, to motivate their students and help them expand their knowledge, an important requirement for their professional development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Metacognition
Introspection
Self-Awareness and Its Effects
Halo Effect

