Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Determining the optimal postlabeling delay for arterial spin labeling using subject-specific estimates of blood
Neville D Gai1, John A Butman1
1Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Background:
Arterial spin labeling with 3D acquisition requires determining a single postlabeling delay (PLD) value. PLD affects the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) per unit time as well as quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) values due to its bearing on the presence of a vascular signal.
Purpose:
To search for an optimal PLD for pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) using patient-specific carotid artery blood velocity measurements.
Study Type:
Prospective.
Subjects:
A control group of 11 volunteers with no known pathology. Corroboration was through a separate group of six volunteers and a noncontrol group of five sickle cell disease (SCD) patients.
Field Strength/Sequence:
Pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling with 3D nonsegmented echo planar imaging acquisition at 3T.
Assessment:
A perfusion-based measure was determined over a range of PLDs for each of 11 volunteers. A third-order polynomial was used to find the optimal PLD where the defined measure was maximum. This was plotted against the corresponding carotid artery velocity to determine a relationship between the perfusion measure and velocity. Corroboration was done using a group of six volunteers and a noncontrol group of five patients with SCD. PLD was determined from the carotid artery velocity and derived relationship and compared with optimal PLD obtained from measured perfusion over a range of PLD values. Error between the perfusion measure at predicted and measured optimal PLD was determined.
Statistical Tests:
Chi-squared goodness of fit; Pearson correlation; Bland-Altman.
Results:
Carotid artery velocity was 63.8 ± 6.6 cm/s (53.1 ≤ v ≤ 72.3 cm/s) while optimal PLD was 1374 ± 226.5 msec (1102 ≤ PLD ≤ 1787 msec) across the 11 volunteers. PLD as a function of carotid velocity was determined to be PLD = -31.94. v + 3410 msec (Pearson correlation -0.93). In six volunteers, mean error between the perfusion measure at predicted and measured optimal PLD was 1.35%. Pearson correlation between the perfusion measure at the predicted PLD and the measure obtained experimentally was r = 0.96 (P < 0.001). Bland-Altman revealed a slight bias of 1.3%. For the test case of five SCD patients, the mean error was 1.3%.
Data Conclusion:
Carotid artery velocity was used to determine optimal PLD for pCASL with 3D acquisition. The derived relationship was used to predict optimal PLD and the associated perfusion measure, which was found to be accurate when compared with its measured counterpart.
Level Of Evidence:
2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:951-960.
Related Concept Videos
Arteries of Lower Limbs
Arteries and Arterioles
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Arteries of the Upper Limbs
Overview of Systemic Arteries
Systemic circulation is the part of the cardiovascular system that carries oxygenated blood away from the heart to the body's tissues and returns deoxygenated blood back to the...

