Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Prediction of all-cause mortality after liver transplantation using left ventricular systolic and diastolic function
Young-Jin Moon1, Jung-Won Kim2, Yun-Sic Bang2
1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Laboratory for Cardiovascular Dynamics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Pre-transplant cardiac function, including left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, significantly predicts liver transplant survival. Combining these assessments offers a more accurate mortality prediction than individual measures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hepatology
- Transplantation Medicine
Background:
- Pre-existing cardiac dysfunction is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes following liver transplantation (LT).
- The predictive value of specific left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) and diastolic function (LVDF) parameters for mortality post-LT requires further clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the individual and combined ability of pre-transplant LVSF and LVDF to predict long-term all-cause mortality in liver transplant recipients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of clinical and Doppler echocardiographic data from 839 adult liver transplant recipients (2009-2012).
- Evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) for LVSF and transmitral E/A ratio for LVDF.
- Multivariate Cox analysis was used to identify significant prognosticators of 4-year mortality.
Main Results:
- Reduced LVEF (≤60%) and decreased E/A ratio (<0.9) were independently associated with higher mortality.
- Patients with both reduced LVEF and E/A ratio exhibited significantly poorer survival (79.5%) compared to those with normal function (93.3%).
- Combined assessment of LVSF and LVDF provided a stronger prediction of survival than either parameter alone.
Conclusions:
- Pre-transplant left ventricular systolic and diastolic function are crucial independent predictors of long-term survival after liver transplantation.
- Combining LVSF and LVDF assessments offers superior prognostic accuracy for mortality risk stratification in LT candidates.
- Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac function should be integral to the pre-transplant assessment for liver transplant recipients.
Abstract:
Although pretransplant cardiac dysfunction is considered a major predictor of poor outcomes after liver transplantation (LT), the ability of left ventricular (LV) systolic/diastolic function (LVSF/LVDF), together or individually, to predict mortality after LT is poorly characterized. We retrospectively evaluated pretransplant clinical and Doppler echocardiographic data of 839 consecutive LT recipients from 2009 to 2012 aged 18-60 years. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 4 years. The overall survival rate was 91.2%. In multivariate Cox analysis, reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF, P = 0.014) and decreased transmitral E/A ratio(P = 0.022) remained significant prognosticators. In LVSF analysis, patients with LVEF≤60% (quartile [Q]1) had higher mortality than those with LVEF>60% (hazard ratio = 1.90, 95% confidence interval = 1.15-3.15, P = 0.012). In LVDF analysis, patients with an E/A ratio<0.9(Q1) had a 2.19-fold higher risk of death (95% confidence interval = 1.11-4.32, P = 0.024) than those with an E/A ratio>1.4(Q4). In combined LVDF and LVSF analysis, patients with an E/A ratio<0.9 and LVEF≤60% had poorer survival outcomes than patients with an E/A ratio≥0.9 and LVEF>60% (79.5% versus 93.3%, P = 0.001). Patients with an early mitral inflow velocity/annular velocity (E/e' ratio)>11.5(Q4) and LV stroke volume index (LVSVI)<33mL/m2(Q1) showed worse survival than those with an E/e' ratio≤11.5 and LVSVI ≥33mL/m2(78.4% versus 92.2%, P = 0.003). A combination of LVSF and LVDF is a better predictor of survival than LVSF or LVDF alone.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes

