Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

08:51
A New Murine Model of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Published on: July 7, 2013
14.8K
Thoracic endovascular repair for acute complicated type B aortic dissections
Marie-Elisabeth Stelzmueller1, Richard Nolz2, Stephane Mahr1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Journal of Vascular Surgery
|January 27, 2019
Summary
Emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute complicated type B aortic dissection (acTBD) shows promising midterm and long-term survival rates in high-risk patients. This effective treatment modality offers excellent outcomes for acTBD management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Acute complicated type B aortic dissection (acTBD) presents significant mortality risks.
- Emergency treatment is crucial for life-threatening acTBD complications like malperfusion or rupture.
- Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is an evolving treatment option for acTBD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the in-hospital mortality and long-term outcomes of emergency TEVAR in patients with acTBD.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of TEVAR for acTBD management.
- To compare outcomes between different clinical presentations of acTBD treated with TEVAR.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 55 patients with acTBD treated with emergency TEVAR between 2001 and 2016.
- Patients were grouped based on clinical presentation: malperfusion/rupture (Group A) vs. pain/enlargement (Group B).
- Data collected included technical success, in-hospital mortality, complications (neurologic dysfunction, endoleaks), and long-term survival and reintervention rates.
Main Results:
- Technical success was achieved in 91% of patients.
- Overall in-hospital mortality was 9%, with significantly higher early mortality in Group A (7%) compared to Group B (2%).
- Long-term survival rates at 5 years were 75%, with 77% freedom from aorta-related death. Freedom from reintervention at 5 years was 63%.
Conclusions:
- Emergency TEVAR is an excellent treatment for high-risk acTBD patients.
- The procedure demonstrates promising midterm and long-term results.
- TEVAR offers a viable option for managing complex aortic dissections.
Related Concept Videos
Overview of DNA Repair
33.6K
In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
Chemically...
33.6K
Mismatch Repair
43.7K
Overview
43.7K
Nucleotide Excision Repair
40.8K
Overview
40.8K
Base Excision Repair
26.3K
One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
The first step of...
26.3K
Thoracic Aorta
1.7K
The thoracic section of the aorta begins at the T5 vertebra and extends to the T12 level at the diaphragm, initially progressing through the mediastinum to the left of the spinal column. Throughout its course in the thoracic segment, the thoracic aorta emits various offshoots known collectively as visceral and parietal branches. The branches that predominantly supply blood to visceral organs are termed visceral branches and include bronchial, pericardial, esophageal, and mediastinal arteries,...
1.7K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
8.0K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
8.0K

