Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Truth in research labelling.

Indian journal of medical ethics·2017

Same author

A need to stand united: reply to the WAME secretary.

Indian journal of medical ethics·2017

Same author

UK response to serial drug company misdemeanour-no action, no shame.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2017

Same author

"Trust the researchers": flying in the face of evidence.

Indian journal of medical ethics·2016

Same author

Requiring anonymised raw data as a condition for publication.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2015

Same author

Transparency as a condition for JRSM publication?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2014

Same journal

Ethical manoeuvring of grounded theory for public health: how grounded can we be?

Indian journal of medical ethics·2026

Same journal

The ethical drift in medical education: Prioritising post graduate entrance preparation over professional competence.

Indian journal of medical ethics·2026

Same journal

Where does "integration" end and "mixopathy" begin? Ayurvedic surgery and beyond….

Indian journal of medical ethics·2026

Same journal

The quality challenge for generic medicines in India: An industrial policy-sensitive perspective.

Indian journal of medical ethics·2026

Same journal

An expanded framework for understanding corruption in healthcare.

Indian journal of medical ethics·2026

Same journal

Withdrawal of care at end of life: Ethical and legal perspectives.

Indian journal of medical ethics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Generation of Human Chimeric Antigen Receptor Regulatory T Cells

Generation of Human Chimeric Antigen Receptor Regulatory T Cells

Published on: January 3, 2025

Whither Cochrane?

Meryl Nass¹, John H Noble²

¹Internal Medicine Physician in private practice, Board Member, Alliance for Human Research Protection, USA., merylnass@gmail.com.

Indian Journal of Medical Ethics

|January 27, 2019

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The ouster of Professor Peter Gotzsche from Cochrane has sparked concerns about research reliability and conflicts of interest. This situation highlights a broader crisis in medical research, necessitating stronger independence and broader methodologies for organizations like Cochrane.

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Generation of Human Chimeric Antigen Receptor Regulatory T Cells

Generation of Human Chimeric Antigen Receptor Regulatory T Cells

Published on: January 3, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

Medical research integrity
Systematic review methodology
Conflicts of interest in research

Background:

The removal of Professor Peter Gotzsche from the Nordic Cochrane Centre has created a crisis of confidence within Cochrane.
Concerns exist regarding conflicts of interest and the reliability of Cochrane reviews.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the implications of Professor Gotzsche's ouster from Cochrane.
To examine the broader crisis of confidence in medical research.
To propose improvements for Cochrane's methodologies and independence.

Main Methods:

Presentation of disputant and bystander reactions to the ouster.
Analysis of concerns related to conflicts of interest and review reliability.
Examination of the timing of an HPV vaccine license expansion following the ouster.

Main Results:

Cochrane's crisis reflects a wider loss of confidence in medical research.
An HPV vaccine review, previously criticized by Gotzsche, received a significant license expansion shortly after his expulsion.
The events raise questions about financial interests influencing research conclusions.

Conclusions:

There is a need to strengthen the value and independence of Cochrane analyses.
Cochrane should consider incorporating additional methodologies.
Enhancing independence from financial interests is crucial for maintaining trust in systematic reviews.