Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

SUMO-Binding Entities SUBEs as Tools for the Enrichment, Isolation, Identification, and Characterization of the SUMO Proteome in Liver Cancer
Published on: November 1, 2019
Proteome-wide onco-proteogenomic somatic variant identification in ER-positive breast cancer
Lampros Dimitrakopoulos1, Ioannis Prassas2, Anieta M Sieuwerts3
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Joseph and Wolf Lebovic Health Complex, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Background:
Recent advances in mass spectrometric instrumentation and bioinformatics have critically contributed to the field of proteogenomics. Nonetheless, whether that integrative approach has reached the point of maturity to effectively reveal the flow of genetic variants from DNA to proteins still remains elusive. The objective of this study was to detect somatically acquired protein variants in breast cancer specimens for which full genome and transcriptome data was already available (BASIS cohort).
Methods:
LC-MS/MS shotgun proteomic results of 21 breast cancer tissues were coupled to DNA sequencing data to identify variants at the protein level and finally were used to associate protein expression with gene expression levels.
Results:
Here we report the observation of three sequencing-predicted single amino acid somatic variants. The sensitivity of single amino acid variant (SAAV) detection based on DNA sequencing-predicted single nucleotide variants was 0.4%. This sensitivity was increased to 0.6% when all the predicted variants were filtered for MS "compatibility" and was further increased to 2.9% when only proteins with at least one wild type peptide detected were taken into account. A correlation of mRNA abundance and variant peptide detection revealed that transcripts for which variant proteins were detected ranked among the top 6.3% most abundant transcripts. The variants were detected in highly abundant proteins as well, thus establishing transcript and protein abundance and MS "compatibility" as the main factors affecting variant onco-proteogenomic identification.
Conclusions:
While proteomics fails to identify the vast majority of exome DNA variants in the resulting proteome, its ability to detect a small subset of SAAVs could prove valuable for precision medicine applications.
Related Concept Videos
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Histone Variants at the Centromere
Proteomics
Proteomics is the study of proteomes' function. It involves the large-scale systematic study of the proteome to denote the protein complement expressed by a genome. Scientist Mark Wilkins coined the term...
Somatic Spinal Reflexes
One of the most well-known somatic spinal reflexes is the stretch reflex, which is activated by the sudden stretching of a muscle. This reflex involves the activation of specialized sensory receptors called muscle spindles, which are located in the muscle tissue and detect changes in the length and speed of muscle contractions. When a muscle is suddenly...
Position-effect Variegation
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...

