Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Recent developments in the analysis of comparative data.

M D Pagel1, P H Harvey

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, U. K.

The Quarterly Review of Biology
|December 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SIMULTANEOUS SELECTIVE PREDATION ON TWO FEATURES OF A MIXED SIBLING SPECIES POPULATION.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

Phylogenetic epidemiology lives.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

South Africa evolving?

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

The emergence of behavioural ecology.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

Reply from p.h. Harvey.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

The state of systematics.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011

Comparative methods test adaptation by analyzing evolutionary change across taxa. Understanding phylogenetic relationships is crucial for distinguishing evolutionary signals from ancestral inheritance to study adaptation.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Phylogenetics
  • Comparative genomics

Background:

  • Comparative methods are vital for testing evolutionary adaptation hypotheses.
  • Accurate phylogenetic relationships are essential to differentiate evolutionary change from common ancestry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare various phylogenetic comparative methods for studying adaptation.
  • To highlight the challenges and trade-offs in selecting appropriate methods based on data type and phylogenetic knowledge.

Main Methods:

  • Discusses methods for discrete and continuous data, including cladistic techniques.
  • Explains approaches that control for phylogenetic effects by analyzing variance or estimating ancestral states.
  • Mentions methods that infer phylogenetic effects from statistical patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Different methods offer varying degrees of phylogenetic control and applicability to real-world data.
  • Methods with greater phylogenetic certainty may have restrictive assumptions or limited data applicability.
  • Statistical pattern-based methods are more flexible but may offer less precise phylogenetic control.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of comparative method involves a trade-off between phylogenetic control and practical application.
  • Selecting the right method depends on the available phylogenetic data and the nature of the traits being studied.