Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Pathophysiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Published on: May 10, 2024
Plasma Urea Cycle Metabolites May Be Useful Biomarkers in Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Lindsay M Moye1, Yuying Liu1, Cristian Coarfa2
1Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.
Insights
This study identified key plasma metabolite differences in children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), suggesting potential non-invasive biomarkers like dimethylarginine and N-acetylputrescine. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use impacts these metabolites, requiring consideration in future research.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Metabolomics
Background:
- Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a growing pediatric esophageal disorder.
- Current diagnosis involves invasive endoscopies, highlighting the need for non-invasive biomarkers.
- This study aimed to discover plasma metabolite candidates for EoE activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify potential non-invasive plasma biomarker candidates for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in children.
- To investigate the influence of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on plasma metabolite profiles in children with and without EoE.
Main Methods:
- Prospective clinical trial involving 24 children (ages 2-18) undergoing upper endoscopy.
- Targeted plasma metabolomics profiling (amino acids, TCA cycle, acetylation, methylation) using mass spectrometry.
- Bioinformatics analysis to compare metabolite levels between active EoE (+EoE) and control (-EoE) groups, stratified by PPI use (+PPI, -PPI).
Main Results:
- Eight plasma metabolites differed significantly (p < 0.05) between EoE patients not on PPIs and controls not on PPIs, with some urea cycle metabolites upregulated.
- Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use upregulated urea cycle metabolites and downregulated methylation metabolites in EoE patients.
- Twenty-seven metabolites showed significant differences across all four groups (+EoE +PPI, +EoE -PPI, -EoE +PPI, -EoE -PPI), with specific changes in methionine, homocysteine, and urea cycle intermediates.
Conclusions:
- Significant plasma metabolite differences exist between children with EoE and controls.
- Dimethylarginine, putrescine, and N-acetylputrescine are notable candidate biomarkers for EoE.
- Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use affects urea cycle metabolites irrespective of EoE status, necessitating stratification in future studies.
Abstract:
Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disorder of the esophagus that has become increasingly recognized in children. Because these children undergo multiple endoscopies, discovering a non-invasive biomarker of disease activity is highly desirable. The aim of this study was to use targeted plasma metabolomics to identify potential biomarker candidates for EoE in a discovery phase. Methods: A prospective, single-center clinical trial was performed on 24 children ages 2-18 years with and without EoE undergoing upper endoscopy for any indication. Blood samples were collected for metabolomics profiling using the subclasses: amino acids, tricarboxylic acid cycle, acetylation, and methylation. Using mass spectrometry and systematic bioinformatics analysis, 48 metabolites were measured and compared between children with active EoE (+EoE) and controls (-EoE). To investigate the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on metabolites, patients were also stratified based on PPI use (+PPI, -PPI). Results: Seven children had active EoE at the time of endoscopy. Eleven children were on PPI (4 with EoE). Of the 48 metabolites measured, 8 plasma metabolites showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) comparing +EoE -PPI to -EoE -PPI, a few of which were upregulated metabolites involved in the urea cycle. There were 14 significant differences comparing +EoE +PPI to +EoE -PPI. This demonstrated that in EoE patients, PPI use upregulated metabolites involved in the urea cycle, while it downregulated metabolites involved in methylation. Comparison among all four groups, +EoE +PPI, +EoE -PPI, -EoE +PPI, and -EoE -PPI, revealed 27 significantly different metabolites. +EoE +PPI had downregulated methionine and N-acetyl methionine, while both +EoE groups and -EoE +PPI had upregulated homocysteine, N-acetylputrescine, N-acetylornithine, arginine, and ornithine. Conclusion: The present study revealed key plasma metabolite differences in children with EoE compared to unaffected controls. Notable candidate biomarkers include dimethylarginine, putrescine, and N-acetylputrescine. PPI use was shown to influence these urea cycle metabolites, regardless of EoE presence. Therefore, future studies should distinguish patients based on PPI use or determine metabolites while not on treatment. These findings will be confirmed in a larger validation phase, as this may represent a significant discovery in the search for a non-invasive biomarker for EoE. Clinical Trial Registration: This clinical trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT 03107819.
Related Concept Videos
Urea Cycle
The Nitrogen Cycle
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
What are Biogeochemical Cycles?
The Water Cycle
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....

